Re: [Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals withcontentissues.

2010-08-31 Thread Peter Damian
From: "David Gerard" >> Actually David wrote the page. I thought it was interesting ... > No, that section was substantially written by Trent Toulouse. I did get the calculator out (sorry). There are 608 edits to the article. 252 were by you. I don't know what section you are referring to. I s

Re: [Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals withcontentissues.

2010-08-31 Thread Peter Damian
- Original Message - From: "David Gerard" To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:23 PM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals withcontentissues. > On 31 August 2010 20:16, Peter Damian wrote: > &

Re: [Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals withcontentissues.

2010-08-29 Thread Andrea Zanni
> > [...] All I am saying is that there is a serious and growing problem > and that someone needs to recognise it for what it is. > As you did mention Eco's interview in another thread, you have surely noted all the Q&A related to collaboration and "consensus" in Humanities vs hard sciences. It s

Re: [Foundation-l] Organization on Wikipedia that deals withcontentissues.

2010-08-29 Thread Peter Damian
- Original Message - From: "David Gerard" > The answer is probably that we're not finished yet and need more > participation from people interested in writing encyclopedically in > the area. > Basically, the answer is interested contributors bothering to put in > the effort, same as any