Well, the point is we should keep our content US-legal.
>From the project scope of Commons, "Commons is not censored, and does quite
legitimately include content which some users may consider objectionable or
offensive. The policy of *"Commons is not censored"* means that a
lawfully-hosted file, w
Mikemoral wrote:
> But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That has
> no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
> Please educate me why.
Who said that the images Jimmy deleted (and which started all this
debate) were illegal in the US?
If t
would not like that they were agreeing to see images that are not
prepared to see. Before the right to choose debit to there have been an
education that it teaches to choose.
--- El dom, 9/5/10, Excirial
escribió:
De: Excirial
Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] On problems
in commons
Para:
2010/5/9 marcos :
> Please, read good. Common Sense. Do you think it´s of common sense delete
> this?...
>
>
Yes. If we are really to follow your POV. Muhammad pictures are far
more offensive for muslim people than porno stuff.
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Poli
doesn't like it.
~Excirial
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:54 PM, marcos wrote:
> Please, read good. Common Sense. Do you think it´s of common sense delete
> this?...
>
>
> --- El dom, 9/5/10, Peter Coombe escribió:
>
> De: Peter Coombe
> Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] On
But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That has
no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
Please educate me why.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Peter Coombe wrote:
> We already remove images of children which are considered to be
> illeg
We already remove images of children which are considered to be
illegal under US law, and I see no one arguing that we do otherwise.
The recent kerfuffle has been over the broader category of sexual
images. But if we are take account of all religious and moral
sensitivities, where will it end?
The
Please, read good. Common Sense. Do you think it´s of common sense delete
this?...
--- El dom, 9/5/10, Peter Coombe escribió:
De: Peter Coombe
Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] On problems in commons
Para: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
Fecha: domingo, 9 de mayo, 2010 22:51
On 9 M
On 9 May 2010 21:29, marcos wrote:
> I want to write here a couple of reflections:
>
> First: Not everything what can be known is worth being known
>
> Second: there have to be a few limits in the free knowledge. These limits
> are the Law and the common sense. Though the common sense is the
I want to write here a couple of reflections:
First: Not everything what can be known is worth being known
Second: there have to be a few limits in the free knowledge. These limits are
the Law and the common sense. Though the common sense is the least common of
the senses
Third:Even we pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
