Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
Cary Bass wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Levy wrote: > >> Pedro Sanchez wrote: >> >>> Of course, wasting resources on april 1st is very sensical. >>> >>> And who cares about purported reach to the whole world and all >>> that fancy words let's bother them

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Ian A. Holton
May I point out that Alex, also known as majorly or Al Tally, is a respected member of the British Wikimedia crowd and not just a one off prankster using a made up e-mail address. Also, this made me laugh and I would have thought that a prank with cultural significance (due to the date), that is re

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Brian
I've just finished coding up Non-Free Content Bot which spiders Google Images and uploads 10 per second to commons with no license information. I wrote the bot using MediaWiki's turing complete template language. Given that Google Images has 916,000,000 images I anticipate it will take 2.90269084 y

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Cary Bass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Levy wrote: > Pedro Sanchez wrote: >> Of course, wasting resources on april 1st is very sensical. >> >> And who cares about purported reach to the whole world and all >> that fancy words let's bother them with our idiotic pranks >> becuase we are

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Birgitte SB
--- On Wed, 4/1/09, Marcus Buck wrote: > From: Marcus Buck > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" > Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 10:16 AM > Birgitte SB hett schreven: > > Right, it obviousl

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Ray Saintonge
Pedro Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > >> This is a (predominantly) English-language mailing list, so using >> those traditions used in the English-speaking world seems to make >> sense to me. >> > Of course, wasting resources on april 1st is very sen

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-04-01 Thread Marcus Buck
Birgitte SB hett schreven: > Right, it obviously "the pompous English majority" conspiring here because > you received a prank from every English speaker on the list. > > If the list were in Spanish so every immature youth in Latin America with too > much time on their hands could access it witho

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Birgitte SB
--- On Tue, 3/31/09, Pedro Sanchez wrote: > From: Pedro Sanchez > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" > Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 9:48 PM > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:45 PM, > Thomas Dalton wro

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread David Levy
Pedro Sanchez wrote: > Of course, wasting resources on april 1st is very sensical. > > And who cares about purported reach to the whole world and all that fancy > words > let's bother them with our idiotic pranks becuase we are majority and > thereforewe have the right to do so > > Very good attit

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Pedro Sanchez
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > > > This is a (predominantly) English-language mailing list, so using > those traditions used in the English-speaking world seems to make > sense to me. > > ___ > foundation-l mailing list > foundat

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/4/1 Pedro Sanchez : > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > >> 2009/4/1 Pedro Sanchez : >> > you'd be annoyed if you started getting lots of bogus messages and silly >> > jokes on december 28 >> >> Yes, because December 28 isn't the traditional day for such things. As >> long

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Pedro Sanchez
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/4/1 Pedro Sanchez : > > you'd be annoyed if you started getting lots of bogus messages and silly > > jokes on december 28 > > Yes, because December 28 isn't the traditional day for such things. As > long as it is just one day a year, it'

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/4/1 Pedro Sanchez : > you'd be annoyed if you started getting lots of bogus messages and silly > jokes on december 28 Yes, because December 28 isn't the traditional day for such things. As long as it is just one day a year, it's a bit of fun. If people started doing it on random days, obvious

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Pedro Sanchez
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Al Tally wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:59 AM, David Levy wrote: > > > > April's fools alredy? *sigh* > > > > Apparently. As I have no desire to have my time wasted by such abuse > > of the mailing list, I've created a filter to delete any future > > e-mails f

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Al Tally
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:59 AM, David Levy wrote: > > April's fools alredy? *sigh* > > Apparently. As I have no desire to have my time wasted by such abuse > of the mailing list, I've created a filter to delete any future > e-mails from Al Tally (with whom my interactions have been uniformly > n

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread David Levy
> April's fools alredy? *sigh* Apparently. As I have no desire to have my time wasted by such abuse of the mailing list, I've created a filter to delete any future e-mails from Al Tally (with whom my interactions have been uniformly negative). ___ foun

Re: [Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Pedro Sanchez
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Al Tally wrote: > Hi all > > I just came across this[1] policy on Commons, which states that from today, > non-free content is going to be allowed to be uploaded on Commons. I'm > rather shocked that this was pushed through without any notice here, or > anywhere, a

[Foundation-l] Non-free content on Commons

2009-03-31 Thread Al Tally
Hi all I just came across this[1] policy on Commons, which states that from today, non-free content is going to be allowed to be uploaded on Commons. I'm rather shocked that this was pushed through without any notice here, or anywhere, and it has become policy, going against Wikimedia's "free cont