Thank you, Michael, for your critical note on the assertations
concerning the huge sums of money. I didn't stand still at the fact
that most of our Wikipedia pages have very low click rates. -
Recently I read that 4% of our pages cause 50% of our traffic.
The idea of Liam is interesting that we co
On 11/7/2010 4:09 PM, geni wrote:
> As for tweak algorithmic factors firstly it's already happened at
> least once (there was a noticeable drop in wikipedia's Google SERPS
> positions a few years back). Secondly since both bing and yahoo rank
> wikipedia highly (in fact while I haven't checked rec
On 6 November 2010 01:20, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> Nobody knows, because the unknown factor in such calculations
> is whether Google would continue to bless Wikipedia so heavily if it
> started running ads. You cannot assume that the current dominance in
> search ranking would be maintaine
> Fred Bauder
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on
> the table each year?
Nobody knows, because the unknown factor in such calculations
is whether Google would continue to bless Wikipedia so heavily if it
started running ads. You cannot assume that the curre
