Thank you, Michael, for your critical note on the assertations
concerning the huge sums of money. I didn't stand still at the fact
that most of our Wikipedia pages have very low click rates. -
Recently I read that 4% of our pages cause 50% of our traffic.
The idea of Liam is interesting that we co
On 11/7/2010 4:09 PM, geni wrote:
> As for tweak algorithmic factors firstly it's already happened at
> least once (there was a noticeable drop in wikipedia's Google SERPS
> positions a few years back). Secondly since both bing and yahoo rank
> wikipedia highly (in fact while I haven't checked rec
On 6 November 2010 01:20, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> Nobody knows, because the unknown factor in such calculations
> is whether Google would continue to bless Wikipedia so heavily if it
> started running ads. You cannot assume that the current dominance in
> search ranking would be maintaine
On 11/6/2010 4:19 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Marcus Buck wrote:
>> An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
>>> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
>>> table each year?
>>>
>>> Fred
>> According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Marcus Buck wrote:
> An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
>> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
>> table each year?
>>
>> Fred
>
> According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3-month global pageview share of
> 4.74010%. Wiki
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:38, Peter Coombe wrote:
> No, we don't *need* ads. But think how much we could improve our
> infrastructure and software with that money. Think how much content we
> could help to free. And think how much more international we could
> become. Personally I think the sacrif
On 6 November 2010 10:56, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
>> Anyway, here's some analysis of this very question done back in 2006.
>> Estimates for annual revenue from adverts ranged from $42 billion to
>> $100 billion, and that's without accounting for our growth since then.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Anyway, here's some analysis of this very question done back in 2006.
> Estimates for annual revenue from adverts ranged from $42 billion to
> $100 billion, and that's without accounting for our growth since then.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-10-30/Wikipedia_v
On 6 November 2010 03:43, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 00:53, Marcus Buck wrote:
>> An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
>>> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
>>> table each year?
>>>
>>> Fred
>>
>> According to alexa.com Facebook h
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 00:53, Marcus Buck wrote:
> An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
>> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
>> table each year?
>>
>> Fred
>
> According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3-month global pageview share of
> 4.74010%. Wikipe
> Fred Bauder
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on
> the table each year?
Nobody knows, because the unknown factor in such calculations
is whether Google would continue to bless Wikipedia so heavily if it
started running ads. You cannot assume that the curre
> "Billions" is not the appropate word here.
>
> Extrapolating from my own personal Adsense experience, I would suggest
> that
> with a single ad per article, the project would only earn perhaps 1 to 5
> million a year.
>
> That's being generous.
>
> W
The question has nothing to do with signing a
An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
> table each year?
>
> Fred
According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3-month global pageview share of
4.74010%. Wikipedia has 0.52984%. That's about 1/9th. According to
Wikipedi
"Billions" is not the appropate word here.
Extrapolating from my own personal Adsense experience, I would suggest that
with a single ad per article, the project would only earn perhaps 1 to 5
million a year.
That's being generous.
W
___
foundation-l
On 5 November 2010 22:44, Fred Bauder wrote:
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
> table each year?
Less than one soul.
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lis
I'll bite - it's about time for our yearly advert flame war anyway. The
answer is 0 dollars. That is because as soon as we put the advertising up we
lose credibility and Wikipedia is no more.
- Brian
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> How many billions in potential advertising
How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
table each year?
Fred
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
17 matches
Mail list logo
