Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> The lack of options to vote for makes it a biased attempt at strong arming
> into a specific directions. In my opinion as it is flawed it is hardly
> relevant.
I'm not sure if other projects have the "Requests for comment" system (or
are familiar with it), but generally pe
Hoi,
The lack of options to vote for makes it a biased attempt at strong arming
into a specific directions. In my opinion as it is flawed it is hardly
relevant.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 14 March 2011 07:21, MZMcBride wrote:
> Liam Wyatt wrote:
> > I presume you are raising this point now in beca
Liam Wyatt wrote:
> I presume you are raising this point now in because of the recent global
> banner referring people to the "March 11 Update" on Strategy Wiki signed by
> Sue - http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/March_2011_Update
> Unless I'm mistaken that banner was only displayed to logged-in e
I presume you are raising this point now in because of the recent global
banner referring people to the "March 11 Update" on Strategy Wiki signed by
Sue - http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/March_2011_Update
Unless I'm mistaken that banner was *only* displayed to logged-in editors
however this RfC
A discussion was started some time ago to discuss when it's appropriate to
use global banners. There was fairly clear consensus from the people who
chose to participate, in my view. Does this need wider discussion before
being adopted or can it be put into place now?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
