> But in general you make an important point. In the Hebrew Wikipedia
> several
> prominent editors adopted an attitude they call "Wiki A / Wiki B", which
> they define more or less like this:
> * To "Wiki A" belong articles that are likely to be used by students to do
> homework. They should be as
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
wrote:
> Your email is a bit too black and white: There are important articles in
> Humanities, not just in exact sciences, and a Bob Dylan album is arguably a
> touch more important than a South Park episode.
>
> But in general you make an importa
Your email is a bit too black and white: There are important articles in
Humanities, not just in exact sciences, and a Bob Dylan album is arguably a
touch more important than a South Park episode.
But in general you make an important point. In the Hebrew Wikipedia several
prominent editors adopted
Correcting articles which shouldn't be there in the first place is probably
a waste of time, but searching for grammatical and technical errors is a
pretty good way to find such articles. I often do it.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 20:45, David Goodman wrote:
> At the opposite end of the scale from F
At the opposite end of the scale from FA, I often look at links from
articles being proposed for deletion by various processes, and daily
I encounter equally questionable non-notable subjects or very
promotional articles, where sometime dozens of people have made typo
or style corrections, or a
"The primary function of the Wikipedias is to educate in the sciences,
philosophy, technology and all that truly useful stuff. Nevertheless
there's an argument for a Featured Article on South Park because it
brings in new blood. Such an article can pique the interest of teens
and twenties and get t
