Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-07 Thread Ryan Kaldari
Agreed. The case doesn't have to be decided by the Supreme Court to affect copyright jurisprudence throughout the United States. Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. (which a substantial portion of our Commons policy is based on) was a decision by the District Court for the Southern District of New

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Ray Saintonge
Dan Rosenthal wrote: > The 10th circuit (or the US District Court for Colorado, which > actually made the decision on remand from the 10th circuit) does not > cover the ninth circuit either. > > AFAICT Eldred v. Ashcroft remains the latest SCOTUS case on the matter. > > If you read Larry Lessig

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Dan Rosenthal
The 10th circuit (or the US District Court for Colorado, which actually made the decision on remand from the 10th circuit) does not cover the ninth circuit either. AFAICT Eldred v. Ashcroft remains the latest SCOTUS case on the matter. If you read Larry Lessigs blog he talks about the decisio

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Birgitte SB
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Andrew Gray wrote: > From: Andrew Gray > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into > copyright > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 12:39 PM > 2009/4/6 Birg

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Andrew Gray
2009/4/6 Birgitte SB : > While this is definitely encouraging news, we might want to hold off on > changing our evaluation of > URAA restorations.  The tenth circuit doesn't include Florida.  I don't know > exactly what the next > level of appeals would be, but we might want to wait for a rulin

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Birgitte SB
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Chad wrote: > From: Chad > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into > copyright > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:09 AM > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:5

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Birgitte SB
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Chad wrote: > From: Chad > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into > copyright > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:09 AM > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:5

Re: [Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread Chad
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:54 AM, GerardM wrote: > Hoi, > This is of sufficient merit that I do it this way. > Thanks, > GerardM > > Aan u verzonden door GerardM via Google Reader: Court: Congress can't > put public domain back into copyright via Ars Technica door > n...@arstechnica.com (Nate Ander

[Foundation-l] Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright

2009-04-06 Thread GerardM
Hoi, This is of sufficient merit that I do it this way. Thanks, GerardM Aan u verzonden door GerardM via Google Reader: Court: Congress can't put public domain back into copyright via Ars Technica door n...@arstechnica.com (Nate Anderson) op 6-4-09 In 1994, Congress jammed a batch of foreign books