Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Andrea Zanni
Thank you Michael, this helps a lot. I knew my question was silly but I didn't know the reason ;-). Aubrey 2010/11/10 Michael Snow > On 11/10/2010 11:27 AM, Andrea Zanni wrote: > > 2010/11/10 Milos Rancic > >> We are discussing now at WM RS list about treating copyright terms for > >> Serbian a

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:27, Andrea Zanni wrote: > 2010/11/10 Milos Rancic > >> We are discussing now at WM RS list about treating copyright terms for >> Serbian authors. >> >> Terms are: >> * Previous situation was 50 years after author's death. >> * The new copyright term in Serbia came in 20

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Michael Snow
On 11/10/2010 11:27 AM, Andrea Zanni wrote: > 2010/11/10 Milos Rancic >> We are discussing now at WM RS list about treating copyright terms for >> Serbian authors. >> >> Terms are: >> * Previous situation was 50 years after author's death. >> * The new copyright term in Serbia came in 2004, introdu

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Andrea Zanni
2010/11/10 Milos Rancic > We are discussing now at WM RS list about treating copyright terms for > Serbian authors. > > Terms are: > * Previous situation was 50 years after author's death. > * The new copyright term in Serbia came in 2004, introducing 70 years > after author's death. > * That mea

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 19:30, Andre Engels wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Milos Rancic wrote: > >> My precise question is: Does US law follow local copyright laws in >> relation to the works published locally and by authors with local >> citizenship? Or not? > > No, many countries app

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Andre Engels
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Milos Rancic wrote: > My precise question is: Does US law follow local copyright laws in > relation to the works published locally and by authors with local > citizenship? Or not? No, many countries apply the 'law of shorter term' (that is, works from other count

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Nathan
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > The servers are in the US and owned by a US organisation which has > minimal overseas assets, which means US law is pretty much the only > one that applies. If you want people in Serbia to be able to re-use > the content, though, you need to

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Milos Rancic
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 18:33, Thomas Dalton wrote: > The servers are in the US and owned by a US organisation which has > minimal overseas assets, which means US law is pretty much the only > one that applies. If you want people in Serbia to be able to re-use > the content, though, you need to ma

Re: [Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Thomas Dalton
The servers are in the US and owned by a US organisation which has minimal overseas assets, which means US law is pretty much the only one that applies. If you want people in Serbia to be able to re-use the content, though, you need to make sure it satisfies Serbian law too. That means you need to

[Foundation-l] Copyright terms, again

2010-11-10 Thread Milos Rancic
We are discussing now at WM RS list about treating copyright terms for Serbian authors. Terms are: * Previous situation was 50 years after author's death. * The new copyright term in Serbia came in 2004, introducing 70 years after author's death. * That means that works which authors died in 1953