Kim Bruning, 21/08/2011 20:29:
> == Next steps ==
>
> I suggest that we now concentrate on constructively discussing the
> meta-data ecology; including viability, security, and practicality.
I personally concluded that wasting a huge lot of time discussing
whether this filter will make us waste a
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:35:00PM -0700, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
> *Please distribute widely*
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *Call for referendum*: The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of the
> Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether members of
> the community support the creati
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> It's really truly not going to be a matter of weeks, I can assure you of
> that.
>
> It may be, at best, a couple of extra days, but we've all been vote checking
> as we go. I don't anticipate much delay if any.
>
A vote by vote check
It's really truly not going to be a matter of weeks, I can assure you of
that.
It may be, at best, a couple of extra days, but we've all been vote checking
as we go. I don't anticipate much delay if any.
___
Philippe Beaudette
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
At the time of the License Commitee with the vote we had te results
also very fast...
Dude... Its all possible when they check all the votes made on day 1
on day 2 etc etc... And the system is very simple to work with.
Best,
Huib
2011/8/21, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen :
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:0
On 20 August 2011 22:48, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
> > cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
>
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
> cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
>> concluding and the results being announced?
>>
>>
> First, I disagree
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
> concluding and the results being announced?
>
>
First, I disagree that it's "ridiculously unrealistic". Vote checking has
already starte
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Risker wrote:
> On 20 August 2011 14:31, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
>
>> I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
>> further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
>> distractions going in any way (though perhaps better sui
On 20 August 2011 14:31, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
> further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
> distractions going in any way (though perhaps better suited in their
> own thread).
>
> Since there is going t
I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
distractions going in any way (though perhaps better suited in their
own thread).
Since there is going to be such a short interval between the vote
concluding, and the res
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 09:00:57AM -0700, Alec Conroy wrote:
> > One *big* problem we have now is: Wikipedia has won. Wikipedia is the
> > encyclopedia anyone actually consults, ever. Wikipedia now defines
> > what an "encyclopedia" is in popular conception.
> >
> > So we don't have any tail-lights
> One *big* problem we have now is: Wikipedia has won. Wikipedia is the
> encyclopedia anyone actually consults, ever. Wikipedia now defines
> what an "encyclopedia" is in popular conception.
>
> So we don't have any tail-lights to chase. What sets our direction?
Well, this is now completely and u
> On 30 June 2011 12:31, Alec Conroy wrote:
>
>> The further we can get away from the model of elementary schools and
>> towards the model of the global universities, the better.
>
>
> +1
>
> (This entire post is gold.)
>
> One *big* problem we have now is: Wikipedia has won. Wikipedia is the
> en
On 30 June 2011 12:31, Alec Conroy wrote:
> The further we can get away from the model of elementary schools and
> towards the model of the global universities, the better.
+1
(This entire post is gold.)
One *big* problem we have now is: Wikipedia has won. Wikipedia is the
encyclopedia anyone
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> *Call for referendum*: The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of the
> Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether members of
> the community support the creation and usage of an opt-in personal image
> filter, wh
On 30 June 2011 10:55, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Tom Morris, 30/06/2011 11:28:
>> I'd have a problem if people started making overwrought
>> comparison to Nazi book burnings too.
> Wow, a reductio ad reductionem ad Hitlerum argument.
Trained professional philosophers can get away with that
Tom Morris, 30/06/2011 11:28:
> I'd have a problem if people started making overwrought
> comparison to Nazi book burnings too.
Wow, a reductio ad reductionem ad Hitlerum argument.
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Uns
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:02, Fajro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:28 PM, wrote:
>
>> What am I misunderstanding? Surely there is a difference between the "filter
>> bubble" that decides what content to show me on it's own, and an "opt-in"
>> filter where I can decide for myself what cont
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:28 PM, wrote:
> What am I misunderstanding? Surely there is a difference between the "filter
> bubble" that decides what content to show me on it's own, and an "opt-in"
> filter where I can decide for myself what content I may or may not want to
> see?
yes, but you
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 17:01, Fajro wrote:
This remind me of this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbi2i_Y7gSE
and http://www.thefilterbubble.com/
I don't like filter bubbles.
"And what's in your filter bubble depends on who you are, and it depends on
what you do - but the thing is t
This remind me of this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbi2i_Y7gSE
and http://www.thefilterbubble.com/
I don't like filter bubbles.
--
Fajro
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
Precisely.
On Jun 29, 2011 3:38 PM, "Wjhonson" wrote:
>
> One type of image being "Image of Muhammad" ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Philippe Beaudette
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
> Sent: Wed, Jun 29,
One type of image being "Image of Muhammad" ?
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Beaudette
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Sent: Wed, Jun 29, 2011 1:35 pm
Subject: [Foundation-l] Call for referendum
*Please distribute widely*
Call for referendum*: The
*Please distribute widely*
*
*
*
*
*Call for referendum*: The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of the
Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether members of
the community support the creation and usage of an opt-in personal image
filter, which would allow readers to volunt
25 matches
Mail list logo
