On 9 May 2010 13:26, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> The overriding question will be the editorial role of the board.
> The Board has no editorial role, on Commons or on any other Project,
> nunless you consider high-level goal-setting and prioritiz
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 07:30, Samuel J Klein wrote:
>
>> Perish the thought. The Board is not controlling content - I
>> would oppose any Board action that did so.
<
>> The Board does not support this - although individuals may - it
>> is not the rol
On 9 May 2010 07:30, Samuel J Klein wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> It's board members directly asserting control over content. Of
>> course it's a major issue.
> Perish the thought. The Board is not controlling content - I would
> oppose any Board action that d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/2010 02:12, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Noein wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm surprised it is apparently needed to be said, but I'm here too
>> because I have faith in "universal values". In fact I've been attracted
>> like a
I'll respond to a few related comments and questions at once:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> It's board members directly asserting control over content. Of
> course it's a major issue.
Perish the thought. The Board is not controlling content - I would
oppose any Board a
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Noein wrote:
>
> I'm surprised it is apparently needed to be said, but I'm here too
> because I have faith in "universal values". In fact I've been attracted
> like a magnet since the day, one year and five months ago, that I wondered:
> "In this world rushing int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/2010 00:05, Milos Rancic wrote:
> There are some political reasons of why I am here. And they are about
> our values: all human knowledge... not censored... consensus
> culture... building encyclopedia etc., not surrealistic comedy...
> [..]
>
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:29 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
>> By now, just two Board members explicitly stated what do they think
>> about Jimmy's action: Jan-Bart de Vreede and Ting Chen (who explained
>> his position in details).
>>
>> According to
On 8 May 2010 17:49, David Gerard wrote:
> I've been working on the RationalWiki article on the decline and
> all-but-collapse of Citizendium:
> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Citizendium - CZ now has less
> contributors or actitvity than *Conservapedia*. And a lot of that was
> due to hasty inte
On 8 May 2010 17:46, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> As far as "which capacity", I think Jimmy's own statements make this
> abundantly clear regardless of what the PR spin says:
> "I am fully willing to change the policies for adminship (including
> removing adminship in case of wheel warring on this is
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:37 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> I don't disagree, but I meant what I said about *single* most important issue!
>
> And I'm not sure that's how I'd frame it. The board statement seemed
> pretty clear; reaffirming existing policy. I guess it depends a bit on
> what capacity yo
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 8 May 2010 17:29, phoebe ayers wrote:
>
>> Well, we as a community don't require such individual statements about
>> any other issue; I realize this may be a personal dealbreaker for you
>> but it doesn't seem like the single most important
On 8 May 2010 17:29, phoebe ayers wrote:
> Well, we as a community don't require such individual statements about
> any other issue; I realize this may be a personal dealbreaker for you
> but it doesn't seem like the single most important issue of our day.
> I'd much rather hear what individual b
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> By now, just two Board members explicitly stated what do they think
> about Jimmy's action: Jan-Bart de Vreede and Ting Chen (who explained
> his position in details).
>
> According to not precise Board's statement I may guess who supports
> Ji
By now, just two Board members explicitly stated what do they think
about Jimmy's action: Jan-Bart de Vreede and Ting Chen (who explained
his position in details).
According to not precise Board's statement I may guess who supports
Jimmy's action and who doesn't. However, I don't want to guess. As
15 matches
Mail list logo
