Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class wikis

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Marcus Buck wrote: > That's a true answer, but at the same time as useless as it can be. > If it's indeed only a matter of "getting around to it" (is it?), then > the fact that they didn't came around to it since April 2008 would > proove my "accusation" that the "

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class wikis

Geoffrey Plourde hett schreven: > Everything takes time. The techs will handle it when they get around to it. > That's a true answer, but at the same time as useless as it can be. If it's indeed only a matter of "getting around to it" (is it?), then the fact that they didn't came around to it

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class wikis

Everything takes time. The techs will handle it when they get around to it. From: Gerard Meijssen To: Wikimedia developers ; Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Sent: Monday, February 2, 2009 3:26:02 AM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class wikis

This refers to the toolserver, not the Wikimedia Foundation servers. This was explained on toolserver-l: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/toolserver-l/2009-January/00 1766.html -Mike Mike.lifeguard mikelifegu...@fastmail.fm ___ foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] second-class wikis

Hoi, Can someone please explain why this is ? Thanks, GerardM 2009/2/1 Marcus Buck > According to SiteMatrix we have 739 projects at the moment. There are > three master partitions for the servers: s1 for enwiki only, s2 for 19 > other projects and s3 for all the rest (that's 719 projects).