http://vdi.pl/drupal/themes/bluemarine/jb6.php
nandosc...@yahoo.it
G Rigoni
Make money in the Internet. We show you how it works
3/31/2012 12:02:36 PM
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/
http://www.benchmarkcs.com/hello.php?html143
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Sent from AT&T's Wireless network using Yahoo! Mail
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
set a branch in new delhi india
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Andre Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, C F wrote:
>> With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
>> the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
>> the phone numbers were the only things intended for
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, C F wrote:
> With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
> the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
> the phone numbers were the only things intended for that email.
Those are probably just their standard signa
With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
the phone numbers were the only things intended for that email.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, C F wro
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, C F wrote:
> wtf?
>
Sometimes people send blank e-mails by accident, it's best to just ignore them.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
wtf?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:05 PM, kometbr...@netzero.net
wrote:
>
>
>
> Kimberly Brown
> 310 310-5477-Cell
> 301 622-2469-Home
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/lis
Kimberly Brown
310 310-5477-Cell
301 622-2469-Home
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Sorry to be blunt but, Why is this question so Wikipedia-centric? Other
> projects have proved ideal testing grounds for usability and such.
>
Because Wikipedia is the cash cow.
I was going to rant, but it became too depressing because it wouldn't
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mike.lifeguard
wrote:
> Granted, you may argue that forcing requests to be made public would
> force more stringent compliance with the standards, but you haven't even
> shown that there is an issue in the first place; you have merely assumed
> that it is so. Begin
2009/10/27 Mike.lifeguard :
> You are a long way from proving your point, but I would encourage you to
> make that request on the talk page of the CheckUser policy page on
> English Wikipedia so it can be pointed out that while there is a public
> request process, most requests are made in private
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Issue 1: The official and public description of CheckUser lays out a
> transparent process for justifying when and how it may be used. In practice,
> it is often used in secret and quick "back door" process. First issue is
> the misrepresentation to
2009/10/13 Gregory Kohs :
> These people are not Wikipedia editors. Is it appropriate and/or
> legal under the terms of the GFDL or the CC-by-SA for a
> freely-licensed work to be "claimed" with a preposition such as "by",
> which by any interpretation of the English language in this usage,
> wou
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> To me, this smacks of an utter disregard for the intent and spirit of
> the free license. It's the same sort of flippant administrative
> attitude that (nearly) allowed Guy "JzG" Chapman to grossly plagiarize
> my original, freely-licensed
Foundation Mailing List
Sent: Tue, October 13, 2009 11:07:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] (no subject)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> It strikes me that this is something that Creative Commons or other
> organizations with Godwin-like attorneys should be aggressively
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> It strikes me that this is something that Creative Commons or other
> organizations with Godwin-like attorneys should be aggressively
> pursuing, but we didn't hear from any of them in the original thread,
> did we? Mike, could you illuminate
> These people are not Wikipedia editors. Is it appropriate and/or
> legal under the terms of the GFDL or the CC-by-SA for a
> freely-licensed work to be "claimed" with a preposition such as "by",
> which by any interpretation of the English language in this usage,
> would connote authorship? Per
David Gerard said:
++
2009/8/13 David Goodman :
> I would be exceedingly uncomfortable with us organizing a negative
> campaign against any publisher not actually violating our copyright.
> . A factual campaign, providing information is another matter. It
> would be entirely appropr
Dear Sir,
I received your email. I am pleased to know that you are interested in this
area.
I give you the way to invest in Vietnam effectively.
The Vietnam policy is to attract foreign investers.
So you have many opportunities to enrich in Vietnam.
You don't have to worry about the law in Vie
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Creating a universal online language should include cross references like music
and photography.
Is it possible to provide links within wiki pages written in moribund languages
to established blog topics within whichever given country the user wishes to
view?
_
23 matches
Mail list logo
