Re: [Foundation-l] What can we do? (was: Copyright terms, again)

aybe more states opted for such a renewal. -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Swedish Wikipedians removes Wikimedia logos

is is not correct and the resolution allows only for EDP recognizing copyright limitations existing in national copyright laws (even though I do not see this in the resolution text). -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundat

foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org

uite obvious, isn’t it? The same frequent mistake is also the reason there is a redirection cz.wikipedia.org → cs.wikipedia.org (Czech language is “cs” according to ISO 639-1, but Czech Republic’s TLD is “.cz” according to ISO 3166-1). --

Re: [Foundation-l] Two questions about the licensing update of media files

ia (et al.) had always been violating copyrights of authors of CC-licensed images used in its articles? Interesting to hear that… -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscri

Re: [Foundation-l] Two questions about the licensing update of media files

ar way, GFDL-only Wikipedia articles of a recent past would probably not have been allowed to use CC-only licensed images.) -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:

Re: [Foundation-l] Two questions about the licensing update of media files

text, which we did all the time). GFDL-only uploads are not very nice (and I am sad to see them, especially on featured media); by all means, encourage CC licenses. But don’t spread FUD, please. -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-

Re: [Foundation-l] A heads up

Obviously, in a perfect world, this would be a built-in behaviour of MediaWiki, but unfortunately, I don’t think it is really feasible in a foreseeable future… -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.

Re: [Foundation-l] GFDL-only + OTRS

FDL. > This should be obvious and hence it does follow that it is correct to > indicate that GFDL only material is not suitable. GFDL is a free culture license, copyleft (license virality) is a completely acceptable condition for Commons. -- [[cs:User:Morm

Re: [Foundation-l] Abuse filter

:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Re: [Foundation-l] Licensing interim update

y-holograph-version that is gonna be invented ten years from now in a license you are granting now, free or not. -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] [1] See e.g. http://www.wipo.int/clea/en/text_html.jsp?lang=en&id=962#JD__Toc48037811 ___ founda

Re: [Foundation-l] Jimmy Wales donation appeal

t is stricken through with that red line (while there is a huge empty margin above the "Please Read:"). Tried Ctrl+F5, no change. -- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]] ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia