Except google isn't asserting any kind of copyright control over these
books, they're just not making it convenient to download them in your
preferred format. Maybe not The Right Thing, but not as boneheaded as suing
a party who reprints public domain material, as was the case in Feist v.
Rural (t
Even if the buyer loses the attribution information, I'd bet that, under the
first sale doctrine, they can resell the poster. (Just not copy and
redistribute.) Right?
On Feb 4, 2009 8:24 AM, "Chad" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 a...
Agreed. I
I guess we'll just
> have to agree to disagree!
>
And perhaps this is the best solution!
Best,
Parker
>
> James
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Parker Higgins
> wrote:
> > I think there's two parallel conversations going on here, which i
I think there's two parallel conversations going on here, which is making it
hard for anybody to come to an understanding.
James, it seems like you're saying that Wikimedia (apparently) espouses
absolute transparency and equality, and in fact only practices those virtues
to the boundaries of commo
