t media should not be remove unless it meets
deletion criteria is illegal, etc.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Mikemoral wrote:
> > But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That
> has
> > no point. Why do we have to remove co
But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That has
no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
Please educate me why.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Peter Coombe wrote:
> We already remove images of children which are considered to be
> illeg
image/file may contain offensive material."
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 21:28, Mikemoral wrote:
>
> > By why censor Commons? Should educational material be freely viewed and,
> > of course, be made free to read, use, etc.
>
>
By why censor Commons? Should educational material be freely viewed and,
of course, be made free to read, use, etc.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:23 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 21:17, Marcus Buck wrote:
>
> > The tags applied should be clear and fact-based. So instead of tagging a
> > pa
