so the Foundation's event policies wouldn't necessarily apply unless they
were put into place by the local entity as well.
As far as I'm aware, the Foundation hasn't (yet?) asked Wikimedia DC to put
this particular policy into effect for Wikimania 2012.
Cheers,
Kirill
-
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:52 PM, emijrp wrote:
> Additional reasons to shut down English Wikipedia as protest ASAP
>
> http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-cuts-funding-for-unesco-after-palestinian-vote-1.392996
This has little enough to do with Wiki(m/p)edia, however; while UNESCO
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jon Davis wrote:
> > IIRC, They said that the "soft limit" would simply mean that they'd make
> > sure any post beyond 30 were at least somewhat useful. The impression I
> got
> > was that if you wanted t
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Tempodivalse wrote:
> At least nine users have pledged to support this fork, and several others
> (including non-WN Wikimedians) are interested - more than there are active
> remaining Wikinews contributors.
Wait, does this mean that Wikinews had fewer than twent
Stop this thread at once! It's gotten entirely too silly!
Kirill
2011/8/24 Newyorkbrad
> I did, but it was deleted. The deletion summary was "that's not
> *particularly
> *silly"
>
> Newyorkbrad
>
> 2011/8/24 David Richfield
>
> > 2011/8/24 Newyorkbrad :
> > > I'm glad I finally found yo
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:23 PM, wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Kirill Lokshin
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think chapters are being cut off I think they are being
> >> centralized. Centralization,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, wrote:
> I don't think chapters are being cut off I think they are being
> centralized. Centralization, not lack of funding, is what I believe will
> make chapters ineffective. Frankly, I think cutting off their funding would
> be less detrimental (although still
2011/8/9 Delphine Ménard
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Kirill Lokshin
> wrote:
>
> > Well, let's be clear here: in what sense are the chapters "participating"
> in
> > the fundraiser, rather than merely being its beneficiaries? The
> und
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:43 AM, wrote:
> You are right that this decentralization doesn't neccessarily have to be
> anything like "chapters". But chapters happened for whatever reason and
> no-one is trying to be rid of them. The validity of the argument that
> chapters aren't aboslutely needed,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:39 PM, wrote:
> Decentralization isn't some random choice that somehow was attached to this
> movement; it is the only way the program functions at all. WMF professionals
> can't begin to account for the program work being accomplished by the
> movement. Has there been
And why would we want to do something like that? We're not here to make
life easier for the SEO industry.
Kirill
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Well, Peter, it's got over 2,000 in-bound links, from user and user talk
pages:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Dan Rosenthal wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Scott MacDonald wrote:
>
> > Imagine if poetlister now engages in identity theft and deception at
> > Wikiversity.
>
> How precisely does one engage in identity theft in a project that does not
> require the submis
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Responding to Scott, and also MZMcBride earlier... I don't think the
> Wikimedia Foundation could successfully make decrees to permanently
> ban editors from all projects. It might be the right solution in some
> cases, and many editors might w
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 05:42 PM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Milos Rancic
> wrote:
> >> On 05/19/2011 10:52 AM, church.of.emacs.ml wrote:
> >>> 1. Display it for logged-in users on
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 10:52 AM, church.of.emacs.ml wrote:
> > 1. Display it for logged-in users only. This is especially useful for
> > information concerning active Wikimedians, e.g. Wikimania, POTY, etc.
>
> Agreed with this in relation to the Boa
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Neil Harris wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/11 00:46, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Brian J Mingus<
>> brian.min...@colorado.edu>wrote:
>> >
>>
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Neil Harris wrote:
> On 10/05/11 00:46, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Brian J Mingus >wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Neil Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 09/0
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Brian J Mingus wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Neil Harris
> wrote:
>
> > On 09/05/11 23:57, Platonides wrote:
> > > Just create your own tld ;)
> > >
> > Sadly, .wp wouldn't pass the new gTLD process: new gTLDs must have at
> > least three characters.
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 19:46, Quim Gil wrote:
>
> > In fact Wikimedia content is also popular among mobile users (directly
> > or through apps), but what about mobile contributions?
>
> I just tried editing an article on en:wp on my shiny new Blac
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> * We need volunteer/community institutions. There are tons of
> frustrations because there are no ways to solve many problems.
>
Indeed. Unfortunately, the various groups within the community that might
stand to lose authority/influence/et
20 matches
Mail list logo
