replace the
> OPEN bill at Keepthewebopen.com. If you'd like to have input during the
> markup process, this is a nice way to do it.
>
Is that 8:30 Pacific Time?
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-
At some point, the jury has to compare the relative strengths
and weaknesses of each potential site. That comparison is difficult enough
between specific cities; it's downright impossible to compare all possible
venues in multiple different countries.
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
izations filing an amicus brief (such as the WMF). Beyond
that, moral support and words of encouragement will have to do.
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
w awesome our policies and tools are - then experienced
editors should just fix the mistakes and gently (!) inform the newbie
why they did what they did. Not only is that approach faster and
easier and less bite-y, but it also makes our content better *now*,
and it gives the newbie a ch
to contact them? The best method of contact will really
depend on what the topic is - informal correspondence about article
contents, formal notice of legal action, DMCA copyright complaint, request
for re-use of a WMF trademark, etc. In many cases you may not even need to
deal with the Foundation&
he phrase "Washington bureaucrat".
--
Jim Redmond
j...@scrubnugget.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
husiastic recruiter for the wiki cause.
This usage is somewhat common in English, but I have to admit that it
doesn't translate well.
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lis
e fundamental
argument remains: the act of *creation* is what earns copyright, not the act
of faithful transcription.
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
n eighth son.)
Congratulations on doing the job of two, Brion. I hope we find a good CTO
to handle the management side for you.
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists
since "Wikimedia" clarifies which foundation we're talking
about. If the name didn't use the word "foundation" - if it were "Wikimedia
Earth" or "Wikimedia United" - then the definite article would not be
necessary.
--
Jim Redmond
j...@scrubnug
ice links elsewhere to
define "copyright" and "verifiable".) By extension, we can keep the revised
notice relatively brief by using links to refer elsewhere for license text
and/or discussion.
--
Jim Redmond
j...@scrubnugget.com
___
found
ections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
Back-Cover Texts.", with a link to the full license text.
Given that, it'd be trivial to change that sentence to "You irrevocably
agree to release your contributions under [link]our license[/link]" and
update the footn
e impact of the
> licence is higher than Wikimania scholarship.
At the moment enwiki's sitenotices alternate between Wikimania scholarships
and the license vote. IIRC it's the same story on other wikis as well.
--
Jim Redmond
[[User:Jredmond]]
nk tags; if
people could actually grok that, then much of the rest of that text could
become unnecessary.
(BTW, I like the banner on Help:Contents.)
--
Jim Redmond
jredm...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
