--
From: "Gregory Maxwell"
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 12:22 AM
To: "Happy-melon" ; "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing
List"
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Status of flagged protection (flagged revisions)
for English Wik
"Jussi-Ville Heiskanen"
wrote in message news:4ac226e2.7010...@gmail.com...
> Indeed I fully agree that ensuring that using the extension
> on massively edited pages is something that works fine, is
> entirely prudent; whereas ensuring perfect functionality
> for the full force of the extension
"Christophe Henner"
wrote in message
news:84a69b0e0910091333k1bcb1c87o8dc7b5df126df...@mail.gmail.com...
> Anyway, soif we want to have the "stars" what's needed is just to put
> all the salaries and costs needed to run the servers and improve the
> software in programm.
So that's the entire '
"Gregory Kohs" wrote in
message news:14b1e7be0910081856r46863edcqea8c3a44420d2...@mail.gmail.com...
> Both of these previous assessments I conducted for free. No more. I
> would
> actually enjoy (as I've e-mailed you privately) expanding the scope of my
> latter study to include perhaps 200 n
We need to think a little bit outside the box, here; this domain should
really be available, and make sense to use, for *all* WMF sites.
http://www.wm.org is only occupied by a websquatter at the moment, AFAICT; I
think a schema like http://wm.org// or
http://wm.org//?oldid= would be cleanest.
IANAL, but I don't think I need to be to say the "The Foundation" is not in
legal jeopardy here unless it chooses to be. It's protected by a
four-thousand-mile moat, a war of independence, several layers of legal code
and a US Supreme Court decision. It doesn't have any assets in the UK as
fa
Something tells me that this was put back and forth through a machine
translator...
:-D
--HM
"Gerard Meijssen"
wrote in message
news:41a006820906150349r26bb0335ve99c0dd42130...@mail.gmail.com...
> Hoi,
> It would be nice if you rephrase this. I do not have a clue what you are
> trying to say
is based on the
> likelihood that we would want accommodations made for ourselves if we
> needed them.
>
>
> David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:16 PM,
> Happy-melon wrote:
>> The Wikimedia
bug18898 (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18898) is relevant,
both in the technical response proposed, which is more appropriate for the
parallel wikitech-l thread, and in that the wiki in question is frwiki. The
external URL linked (http://pacli.appspot.com/posterstats/tick) see
The Wikimedia wikis are, ultimately, private websites, owned and operated by
the Foundation. That the software they run happens to allow millions of
users the ability to make changes to said site is ultimately just fortunate
coincidence: the ability to edit Wikimedia wikis is a privilege, not a
10 matches
Mail list logo
