2012/2/10 Liam Wyatt :
>
> With the specifics of "is this a political lobbying wing of the WMF or
> not"...
> I think it is quite clear to everyone that Wikimedians have a hard time
> agreeing about *anything* but that the two things we all agree on is "Free"
> (in the technical sense) and that pr
2012/2/8 Steven Walling :
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Leinonen Teemu wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Has there been any attempt to start a Wikimedia project focusing on free
>> 3D models?
>>
>> I think, right now it would be the right timing for it. The prices of 3D
>> printers and other compute
2012/2/7 Svip :
> On 7 February 2012 04:49, MZMcBride wrote:
>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Bad_choice_of_featured_article
>> is pretty good reading.
>
> The complaints usually sums as 'hey, great work on that article,
> unfortunately, I am a bit uncomfortable with subject at ha
2011/11/26 Bod Notbod :
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
>> There has been some discussion in journalism circles that newspapers, who
>> after all, provide the raw material for many of our topical articles
>> might copy our system of organizing material under a subject headi
1&submit=Submit
(providing the link to this tool at the risk of enabling teh
censorshipz by dark and powerful outside organizations who might abuse
it to restrict Wikipedia's own unfiltered, free speech
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random according to their own
world views ;)
Having followed the recent discussions from the sidelines (and
speaking as a longtime volunteer), I found the various appeals to
principles such as decentralization and subsidiarity somewhat
abstract.
Of course BirgitteSB is absolutely correct in that there is a strong
consensus that content curat
I have added your postings to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HaeB/Timeline_of_distributed_Wikipedia_proposals
Regards, HaeB
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
