Hi Lane,
your proposed workflow is a good description of how I would like the SR
procedure to function in an ideal world. I am not myself at the forefront of SR
discussions, but I'd definitely like to see a more streamlined process and a
better way of signaling to participants which projects ar
t; editors or users then you must first notify the Wikimedia Research
> Committee by describing your project. After your project gets approval
> then you may begin."
>
> How could that not be seen as a requirement? Do you think there is a
> way to phrase it so that it would
Welcome Lydia, it's an exciting time to work with WMDE, best of luck in your
new role.
Dario
On Mar 9, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I wanted to take a moment to introduce myself. I'm Lydia and just
> started working for Wikimedia Germany. Some of you might know m
I put together a short explanation of how clicktracking works, what data it
stores and why we use it. I'll work with Oliver to make sure this is also
captured in the AFT5 FAQ. Feel free to contact me off-list if you have specific
questions that I haven't answered here.
Dario
* What is clicktr
Kim,
what about we stop naming and shaming and start thinking of how to solve
problems instead? Let's sit down and discuss how to fix the various issues that
have been raised on the lists, obtain community feedback and allow the
researchers to resume the collection of responses they need to com
, important research
initiative like this one, and I apologize for the bumps in the road. We believe
that supporting research is part of our mission: it helps advance our
understanding of ourselves. So thanks again for all support you can give in
making this a success.
Dario Taraborelli
Senior
Hi WereSpielChequers,
I worked on the data analysis for previous AFT versions and I believe I've
already answered on a number of occasions your questions as to what we could
test and what we couldn't in the previous phase, but I am happy to do this here
and clarify what the research plans for t
The AFT v.4 data is documented here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Data
Dario
On Oct 26, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:09, David Gerard wrote:
>> *slaps own forehead*
>>
>> So is the data to be thrown away too?
>>
>> (Is there anywhere to l
> The simple answer: Maybe, but how could i know that?
>
> The smartass answer: Maybe, but how could i know that after clicking
> 'Next' i wouldn't be presented with a stupid JavaScript error message,
> punishing me for clicking 'Next' before filling the required fields?
on the frontpage you can
Nikola, Amir,
let me answer your points as I am one of the people behind the expert
barriers survey. The design with two blocks of questions with a different
framing is intentional and is based on the results of a long pilot that we
ran for one month (Dec 2010-Jan 2011) prior to the official launc
10 matches
Mail list logo
