On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jürgen Fenn
wrote:
> Am 3. April 2012 22:22 schrieb Samuel Klein :
>
> I would like to add another option: Who not merge all projects into
> Wikipedia proper? The lack in participation in the sister projects is
> largely due to the fact that hardly anyone knows abou
Hoi,
The WikiData project is at first very much technical. Software is developed
and as the software gains a certain level of maturity, a community will
start to grow. This community will slowly but surely become integrated with
other Wikimedia projects.
At this stage all eyes are on Wikipedia but
On 5 April 2012 02:05, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, George Herbert
> wrote:
>> Has this been an observed issue within the WMF?
>
> In some areas. In my view, a well-functioning agile team is
> self-organizing and self-managed, and it's a manager's job to
> primarily set
The policies of each project are different for a very good reason.
e.g. If English Wikiquote was merged into English Wikipedia, the vast
majority of the quote pages would be deleted very quickly, for good or
ill. I know I would be the first to get out the sickle. :P
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:22 P
Hi everyone, I'm "new" on the list and this is my fist email, but I've been
reading for a while(I'm from es.wiki). I support what Jürgen said, Most of
the Wikimedia projects are not very popular (with the exception of
Wikipedia and maybe commons). I talk about what I've read and listened to
people
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, George Herbert
> wrote:
>> Has this been an observed issue within the WMF?
>
> In some areas. In my view, a well-functioning agile team is
> self-organizing and self-managed, and it's a manager's job to
> prima
I would love to see two specific proposals taken up.
One is "The Wikipedia Journal" as discussed here
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Journal_%28A_peer-review_journal_to_allow/encourage_academics_to_write_Wikipedia_articles%29
Currently
working on corporate partners for this.
And the
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> I totally second SJ's poke for more new projects! Although our flagship
> project is highly successful, it would be good if we try to keep creating
> new communities. I have been sad for quite a while now that we don't create
> new projects any mo
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> Has this been an observed issue within the WMF?
In some areas. In my view, a well-functioning agile team is
self-organizing and self-managed, and it's a manager's job to
primarily set that team up for success, hire the right people, replace
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as I mentioned in a response to Liam the other day, we've been working
> on having org charts generated in a more automatic, scalable form.
>...
Thank you for that.
On a meta-question that raises - there are a lot of direct repo
Hi folks,
as I mentioned in a response to Liam the other day, we've been working
on having org charts generated in a more automatic, scalable form.
A contractor, Mark Holmquist, has been working on an open source tool
for this the last few weeks to do this. It's still highly
experimental. In part
Am 3. April 2012 22:22 schrieb Samuel Klein :
> Ziko:
>> what would a WMF evaluation of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut
>> down such
>> a project... cease to mention it on Wikipedia main pages... or invest money
>> in promoting it?
>
> Good questions, subtle answers. Those are not t
Hey :)
just a quick reminder that the english one will be in about 23 hours.
Cheers
Lydia
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Next week the Wikidata team will be complete and start working at full
> speed. Finally! \o/ I will be holding the first round
I totally second SJ's poke for more new projects! Although our flagship
project is highly successful, it would be good if we try to keep creating
new communities. I have been sad for quite a while now that we don't create
new projects any more. It would be great to see one new project every year
:)
On 3 April 2012 07:04, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
> > Will the archives be permanently split?
>
> Probably -- advanced mailman surgeries carry a high risk of fatal
> mistakes (e.g. we have a fancy pipermail URL alias, but the archive
> rebuild is ca
I don't know if this makes sense, so I beg your patience for my ignorance.
But would it be an option to duplicate the archive? Then both the old and
the new links will work. It would be a Great Pity if the new list would not
contain the archive of the old list.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Abril de
16 matches
Mail list logo
