Hi.
What happened with implementing software related to controversial content?
There was quite a bit of hubbub at some point, then Wikimedia pulled back a
little (and Sue visited Germany to give some assurances)... what's the
current status of the project? Is it still a project? (If there's a proj
On 1 March 2012 18:27, Béria Lima wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> So after receive authorization from all candidates, the list of candidates
> + statements are in meta, and you can find it here: http'://
> meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapter-selected_Board_seats/2012/Candidates
>
> Until 14 March is time f
Hello people,
So after receive authorization from all candidates, the list of candidates
+ statements are in meta, and you can find it here: http'://
meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapter-selected_Board_seats/2012/Candidates
Until 14 March is time for questions, so if you have any questions to any
of t
2012/3/1 David Gerard :
> Other companies doing similarly:
>
> http://blog.nestoria.co.uk/why-and-how-weve-switched-away-from-google-ma
> http://www.fubra.com/blog/2011/11/24/google-maps-free-alternatives/
... And, in case anybody missed this piece of news, so will
Wikimedia's official mobile app
http://blog.foursquare.com/2012/02/29/foursquare-is-joining-the-openstreetmap-movement-say-hi-to-pretty-new-maps/
"When we initially began looking around for other map providers, we
found some incredibly strong alternatives. And while the new Google
Maps API pricing was the reason we initially sta
Hi everyone,
I'm pleased to welcome a new member of to the mobile engineering team.
Lindsey Smith started this week as our new Mobile UI/UX contractor.
She'll working with us in San Francisco helping us flush out the look,
feel, and experience across all of our mobile projects. This fits a
critica
Querida comunidade Wikimedia:
Antes de mais nada, muito obrigado a todos pela ajuda com os esforços para
a contratação do cargo de Diretor Nacional de Programas do Brasil. Foi uma
experiência única para todos nós, e um esforço emocionante que produziu
resultados maravilhosos (sem mencionar muito
Dear all,
A quick update on New Models of Affiliation for the Wikimedia Movement
since the publication of the board letter on 13 Feb. The letter is at
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_affiliation_models. From the
emails responding to this, SJ and I extracted a number of relevant
questions
Dear all:
We're very proud to announce the beggining of the activities of the
Wikipedia Student Club in the Faculty of Philosophy and Literature
(Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, FFyL) of the National Autonomous
University of Mexico, one of the most relevant in Latin America and the
most important
> OK. Any strong objections to changing the list name and scope (the
> latter being the description at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l ) to be
> all-encompassing for Wikimedia-wide issues?
>
> The rename would likely occur by unsubscribing current members from
> this li
On 1 March 2012 16:30, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The rename would likely occur by unsubscribing current members from
> this list and re-subscribing them to the new one, to avoid breaking
> links or accidentally corrupting archives -- meaning that list
> archives pre-move would be accessible via a dif
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> That sounds reasonable. Most things discussed on this list are not
> specially relevant to the Foundation.
OK. Any strong objections to changing the list name and scope (the
latter being the description at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/
rupert THURNER wrote:
> "Amir E. Aharoni"
>> David Gerard :
>> > Strainu wrote:
>> >> If names are that important for you, go ahead and rename foundation-l,
>> >> but there is really no need for yet another list.
>> >
>> > +1
>> Another +1.
> +1
That sounds reasonable. Most things discussed on
On Mar 1, 2012 12:12 PM, "Amir E. Aharoni"
wrote:
>
> 2012/3/1 David Gerard :
> > On 1 March 2012 10:23, Strainu wrote:
> >
> >> If names are that important for you, go ahead and rename foundation-l,
> >> but there is really no need for yet another list.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Adding a new list w
2012/3/1 David Gerard :
> On 1 March 2012 10:23, Strainu wrote:
>
>> If names are that important for you, go ahead and rename foundation-l,
>> but there is really no need for yet another list.
>
>
> +1
>
> Adding a new list would be largely redundant.
Another +1.
There just aren't so many Founda
Just to clarify, who else has access to internal, as a rule? Trusted
volunteers, chapter staff/officers, and the majority of WMF staff and
contractors?
Richard
On 01/03/2012 11:07, Thomas Dalton wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012 10:55 AM, "Ilario Valdelli" wrote:
I would correct that not *all* chapters
On Mar 1, 2012 10:55 AM, "Ilario Valdelli" wrote:
>
> I would correct that not *all* chapters board members have access in
internal.
>
> The number of subscriptions were limited to three per chapter, as I know.
It was five per chapter, but that limit was removed a while back.
On 1 March 2012 10:23, Strainu wrote:
> If names are that important for you, go ahead and rename foundation-l,
> but there is really no need for yet another list.
+1
Adding a new list would be largely redundant.
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We currently have this public list for Wikimedia Foundation matters,
> as well as a private list called "internal-l" which in practice is in
> large part used for WMF/chapters discussions, because chapter board
> members are added
În data de 1 martie 2012, 11:30, Benjamin Lees a scris:
> This proposal seems fine to me, but I'm not sure it will address the
> issue you seem to be targeting (that discussions aren't held
> publicly).
I'll go further and say that further splitting the lists will lead to
more cross-posting and q
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> We currently have this public list for Wikimedia Foundation matters,
> as well as a private list called "internal-l" which in practice is in
> large part used for WMF/chapters discussions, because chapter board
> members are added to it by defa
Hi all,
We currently have this public list for Wikimedia Foundation matters,
as well as a private list called "internal-l" which in practice is in
large part used for WMF/chapters discussions, because chapter board
members are added to it by default. The latter is often used for
discussions that i
22 matches
Mail list logo
