http://wiki.wikimedia.in/ looks very good! Congratulations, and keep
up the good work!
--
David Richfield
[[:en:User:Slashme]]
+27718539985
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
We would be able to look at just the edit summaries, but that would only
provide us with analysis on edits that were successfully completed. By
including the actual clicks in the tracking, we can do analysis on the
edit/save ratio (% of total edit attempts that were successfully saved).
Howie
On
Thanks for the video.
One remark : for the futures ones, would it be possible to improve the
soundtrack,
the understanding would be easier for non english native speakers.
Thierry
2012/2/6 Liam Wyatt
> I've not yet had a chance to watch the video so I can't speak about the
> technical aspects
I've not yet had a chance to watch the video so I can't speak about the
technical aspects (or the content), but I would like to say THANKS for
doing this! I'm looking forward to videoing of presentations like this
being a standard procedure in the future. This will enable more people to
stay up-to-
Every month, there's a meeting at the Wikimedia Foundation offices
(with remote call-in) where we review recent metrics and activities in
the different departments for the previous month. Starting with the
meeting covering January, which took place on February 2, we are now
capturing these meetings
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:26, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On 2/2/12, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> We're getting very off topic, but you are right that there is a problem
>> with dormant chapters. I know nothing about the Russian chapter, but I do
>> know how difficult it was to to get the first Wikimedia UK
The person running it is Dario Taraborelli, our chief research officer;
he's currently on holiday. Hopefully we'll have more specifics soon - in
the meantime I've started a new FAQ item at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5/Help#What_are_the_new_phrases_like_.22a
On 2/2/12, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> We're getting very off topic, but you are right that there is a problem
> with dormant chapters. I know nothing about the Russian chapter, but I do
> know how difficult it was to to get the first Wikimedia UK out of the way.
>
> Perhaps the WMF board should ask C
