Today we were pleased to be notified that the Wikimedia Foundation was
chosen #1 among a list of 100 global NGOs.
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/23/wikimedia-foundation-voted-1-global-ngo-by-the-global-journal/
>From their press release on the announcement: "Recognizing the significant
role o
Dear all,
I want to remind everyone to officially start a bid for the locale of
Wikimania 2013. All bids made so far are *unofficial* and cannot be
considered, as long as they are not in the list of official bids on
this page:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2013_bids
The possibility
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/01/23/1725231/carl-malamud-answers-goading-the-government-to-make-public-data-public
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundati
When I was brought on board as a list admin/moderator, I was told that it
was very much a case of a hands-off approach. This does not mean, however,
that anything goes. Usually a reminder, whether one or one or by a post to
the list, suffices. Moderation is very much the last step, and has only
bee
On 23 January 2012 18:09, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> Since it's unlikely the foundation mailing list will agree to enable
> such a comment section on every Wikipedia article (although enabling
> it is quite easy: just choose a "comment" extension from
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_Matrix/AllE
On 23 January 2012 14:53, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On the surface this is a very frivolous post. Funnily enough I have
> a serious point I have been nursing along for a while. Any
> list moderators listening? There are times when the mailing
> list itself can be a source of infighting and in
Since it's unlikely the foundation mailing list will agree to enable
such a comment section on every Wikipedia article (although enabling
it is quite easy: just choose a "comment" extension from
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_Matrix/AllExtensions and
enable it on Wikipedia), maybe we can t
Note that we are adding a sorta-quasi-comments section, just not on the
articles; see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5
On 23 January 2012 17:31, Svip wrote:
> On 23 January 2012 18:16, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Gerard Me
Le 23/01/2012 05:08, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:13 AM, cyrano wrote:
>> What about sharing the whole databases among the millions of users, in
>> some p2p net with a lot of redundancies?, something like a dense, cloudy
>> internet of databases who remains whole eve
On 23 January 2012 18:16, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> wrote:
>
>> Having comments in your face at the bottom to me is not only something I
>> would resent, it would also add more clutter that I have to download every
>> time I read an article.
>
> I se
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> A comment section under every Wikipedia article seems to be a very bad
> idea. You read a Wikipedia article to learn about the subject at hand, you
> can read comments on the talk page. Reading the talk page only makes sense
> when
Hoi,
A comment section under every Wikipedia article seems to be a very bad
idea. You read a Wikipedia article to learn about the subject at hand, you
can read comments on the talk page. Reading the talk page only makes sense
when you are interested in learning more about what people have to say
ab
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM, cyrano wrote:
>
>> Mike, I don't know how's the political landscape is in the USA, but you
>> would say that there is few significative corruption and collusion?
>>
>>
>>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_b
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM, cyrano wrote:
> Mike, I don't know how's the political landscape is in the USA, but you
> would say that there is few significative corruption and collusion?
>
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_by_country#Rankings
The U.S. is below most of Europe, and
>
> >People can subscribe and set their preferences to not receive any emails,
> then they can email the list with no problems.
>
>
> this way ,we can slove personal problem.
>
But we can not slove public problem.
To slove that.
Separate article 1 by 1.
Then people who want to read article,serch
This problem can not slove be
>People can subscribe and set their preferences to not receive any emails,
then they can email the list with no problems.
Only do this .
People who wants to
2012/1/23 Thomas Dalton
> People can subscribe and set their preferences to not receive any emails,
> then th
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:13 AM, cyrano wrote:
> What about sharing the whole databases among the millions of users, in
> some p2p net with a lot of redundancies?, something like a dense, cloudy
> internet of databases who remains whole even if it looses part of
> itself? Does it sound unwordly?
17 matches
Mail list logo
