On 16 January 2012 02:22, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> One of the
> risks of using this between Wikipedias is that those in the new language
> will see it as data dumping. I think some take pride in the fact that
> their articles on a subject are independently developed.
>
Yes I agree this is a potent
On 01/15/12 5:19 PM, Liam Wyatt wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just found this today, from New Scientist: "learn a language, translate
> the web"
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328476.200-learn-a-language-translate-the-web.html
> It's an article about a startup (from the same fellow who did ReCapt
Hi all,
I just found this today, from New Scientist: "learn a language, translate
the web"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328476.200-learn-a-language-translate-the-web.html
It's an article about a startup (from the same fellow who did ReCaptcha)
that provides language lessons by asking the
Hoi,
It was a bad plan to create a Wikipedia in all these languages. It is made
worse by not creating wikis that have an equivalent on any of the
"other" WMF projects. When you think that the other projects are treated
fairly, please reconsider. What is clear is that what I used to call the
"other"
If you would like a wiki to be created on the beta, request it. I don't
know why peter thought it was a good idea to create Wikipedias in every
language, that wasn't the initial plan. It even says right on the front
page:
"The list of all projects now available can be listed below, in case you
wan
Dear all,
I was the [[:m:User:555]], mainly active on the last years of my volunteers
actions on Wikimedia Commons and Wikisource. I've left the Wikimedia
projects mainly because the lack of energy from my side to keep trying to
get free time to work in projects fully neglected by the Wikimedia st
