Welcome, wish you best,
Mardetanha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> ***Resending this note because the earlier version seemed to have
> really broken formatting. Hope this is better.***
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I’m delighted to tell you that the Wikimedia Foundation has a new
>
Hey everyone,
Since folks have been asking about it, I wanted to announce that the
features development team at the Wikimedia Foundation will be holding an
office hours (in #wikimedia-office) about the general past, present, and
future of MediaWiki features being worked on here at the WMF.
This w
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:55, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
>> > Hi Wikipedians,
>> >
>> > I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
>> > Wikipedia article has the best quality.
>> >
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:55, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
>> > Hi Wikipedians,
>> >
>> > I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
>> > Wikipedia article has the best quality.
>> >
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> 2011/12/20 David Gerard :
> > On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris wrote:
> >
> >> Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
> >> experienced user, or later the WikiProject editors, would not be
> >> chosen as the h
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, WereSpielChequers <
werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > --
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Wikipedians,
> > >
> > > I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
> > >
2011/12/20 David Gerard :
> On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris wrote:
>
>> Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
>> experienced user, or later the WikiProject editors, would not be
>> chosen as the high-quality stable version.
>
>
> Yao did in fact mention that other
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> > Hi Wikipedians,
> >
> > I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
> > Wikipedia article has the best quality.
> >
> > It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and
>
> --
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
>
> > Hi Wikipedians,
> >
> > I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
> > Wikipedia article has the best quality.
> >
> > It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and
On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> Hi Wikipedians,
>
> I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
> Wikipedia article has the best quality.
>
> It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and find out, within
> a specified time range (e.g. the past 6
On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris wrote:
> Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
> experienced user, or later the WikiProject editors, would not be
> chosen as the high-quality stable version.
Yao did in fact mention that other factors would need consideration.
A
11 matches
Mail list logo
