Wikitrust already provider a Selection API, which returns a list of the top
ranked revisions of an article if you are trying to pick a single revision
to show to users. This API is useful for the problem of creating an offline
version of Wikipedia (such as book or DVD formats), where the preference
On 20/12/11 12:50, Kim Bruning wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:35:24AM +1100, Tim Starling wrote:
>> On 13/12/11 01:36, Teofilo wrote:
>>> Let us stop asking users to individually tag every wrong picture! Let
>>> us have some developers create a tool to find wrong pictures and
>>> rotate them b
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:35:24AM +1100, Tim Starling wrote:
> On 13/12/11 01:36, Teofilo wrote:
> > Let us stop asking users to individually tag every wrong picture! Let
> > us have some developers create a tool to find wrong pictures and
> > rotate them back to their original orientation!
>
> W
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:35:03PM +, David Gerard wrote:
> On 18 December 2011 12:38, Mike Dupont
> wrote:
>
> > Ok. I understand that. Maybe I am getting upset over nothing, but when
> > it comes to shutting down people who copy small clips and snippets
> > from movies, it seems that the
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 22:38, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
> Wikipedia article has the best quality.
>
> It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and find out, within
> a specified time range (e.g. the past 6 months), which
With this idea, not only can Wikipedia provide two views for every article
("Latest" and "Stable"), but we can even select certain Wikipedia articles
and put their Stable versions into a DVD edition or printed edition for
sale.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> Hi Wikipedians,
Yes, Wednesday evening in North America. 4PM PST, 7PM EST
___
Philippe Beaudette
Head of Reader Relations
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
415-839-6885, x 6643
phili...@wikimedia.org
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Risker wrote:
> Since that 0:00 UTC is always confusing to me, wo
Since that 0:00 UTC is always confusing to me, would I be correct to assume
that this would be taking place Wednesday evening in North America?
Risker
On 19 December 2011 19:28, Steven Walling wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I think most Foundation-l subscribers know Philippe Beaudette from the
> Foundat
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Abbas Mahmood wrote:
>
>> From: tba...@wikimedia.org
>> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:35:18 +0100
>> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Foundation's
>> 2010-11 Annual Report
>
>> Just a quick note th
Hey all,
I think most Foundation-l subscribers know Philippe Beaudette from the
Foundation, but perhaps not all are aware of his title, Head of Reader
Relations, or exactly what that department is and what role it fills.
If you'd like to hear an update on the office of reader relations at the
WMF
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia article has the best quality.
It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and find out, within
a specified time range (e.g. the past 6 months), which revision remained
unchallenged for the lo
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:20:34AM +0100, Kim Bruning wrote:
>
> Further SOPA debate postponed 'till wednesday.
>
> https://twitter.com/#!/jasoninthehouse/status/147819972498948097
The Easiest way to kill SOPA would be to interact with the committee before
Wednesday.
Are there any DC wikimed
12 matches
Mail list logo
