We can have our fresh and promising Wikimedian-in-Residence there raise the
issue with museum staff. This news took us by surprise.
Apparently, the Google-IMJ project is quite a bit more than simple scanning
of the material, it involves more hypertextual contextual work.
Please, a more friendly an
Might make sense.
2011/9/26 とある白い猫
> Meta main page seems to be not very multi-lingual because it appears to be
> difficult to update. Each translation is more or less outdated and often
> with an outdated/older style. I propose a template structure where style
> info is "removed" into a templat
I wonder if the Page Translation[1] feature of the Translate
extension[2] would make it easier to manage this, It appears to (but
not written), that when the main translation (en for example) is
"touched" that it will mark the other ones for needing updates.
[1]. http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Tran
Meta main page seems to be not very multi-lingual because it appears to be
difficult to update. Each translation is more or less outdated and often
with an outdated/older style. I propose a template structure where style
info is "removed" into a template and translations only deal with words.
Feel
Wikimedia Israel and I met with the Israel Museum in the days immediately
following Wikimania. The specific purpose of that event was to set up a
'Wikipedian in Residence' position at their research centre, starting with a
project to create articles about Israeli artists in English and Hebrew
Wikip
OMG ISRAEL IS OUT OF USA? REALLY?
Come on. The point here is that originality is a common requirement for
claiming copyright.
2011/9/27 Anthony
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Ray Saintonge
> wrote:
> > On 09/26/11 12:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
> >> If originals don't have copyright, how can The
Hello,
Thanks. I have now created a subpage to the Bookshelf Project, where we
collect materials such as these. Please help out with the translations here:
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bookshelf/Three_Wikipedia_films
Best wishes,
Lennart
2011/9/21 emijrp
> Hey Lennart, they are great v
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:57 PM, emijrp wrote:
> OMG ISRAEL IS OUT OF USA? REALLY?
>
> Come on. The point here is that originality is a common requirement for
> claiming copyright.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweat_of_the_brow
___
foundation-l mailing
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> On 09/26/11 12:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
>> If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any
>> copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
>
> Th
On 09/26/11 12:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
> If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any
> copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
The cited case is a US case, and not necessarily binding in other
>
>
>
> Finally, the Dead Sea Scrolls[1] have copyright[2]. Courtesy of The Israel
> Museum. Congratulations.
If the Dead Sea Scrolls were divinely inspired, like other Biblical texts,
then there is an argument that the author is still alive ;-)
(c) God, 2011
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> ASK THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY.
>
> Damn. Joke fail.
>
> -Sarah
>
Emijrp has a valid point.
We routinely dismiss this kind of bogus claims of copyright from museums
--
Pedro Sánchez
http://drini.mx
@combinatorica
_
ASK THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY.
Damn. Joke fail.
-Sarah
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> As the British Museum.
>
> Hehehehe.
>
> --Sarah (Stierch)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
>
>> If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum cla
As the British Museum.
Hehehehe.
--Sarah (Stierch)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
> If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any
> copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any
copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
2011/9/26 Neil Babbage
> The digital copies of the Dead Sea Scrolls have copyright, not the
> originals...
The digital copies of the Dead Sea Scrolls have copyright, not the
originals...
On 26/09/2011 19:58, emijrp wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Finally, the Dead Sea Scrolls[1] have copyright[2]. Courtesy of The Israel
> Museum. Congratulations.
>
> By they way: Hi Wikimedia Israel.
>
> Regards,
> emijrp
>
> [1
Hi all;
Finally, the Dead Sea Scrolls[1] have copyright[2]. Courtesy of The Israel
Museum. Congratulations.
By they way: Hi Wikimedia Israel.
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/
[2] http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/terms_pg
___
fou
On 26 September 2011 14:23, WereSpielChequers
wrote:
> BTW I was sorry to hear about your problems on EN wiki, I don't know the
I should point out that block, or even ban, status has never been a
barrier to participation on this list.
- d.
___
foun
Hi Phil,
Re your comment "nobody seems to be committed to clearing backlogs of
articles that actually provide legal, if not journalistic, risk for WP and
its parent".
You might want to have a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Unreferenced_BLP_Rescue
Since Dashbot's run in January 20
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:39, Kim Bruning wrote:
>> And now for something completely different. :-)
>>
>> Who here has already had their 10th wikibirthday, and who will have it soon?
>>
>> Seems like an excuse for a party :-)
>>
First recor
20 matches
Mail list logo
