On 20 August 2011 23:38, Milos Rancic wrote:
> I hold 7 votes, at the end: one real account, five bots and one of my
> auxiliary accounts -- not used for years -- have got right to vote. I
> have one more account, but I don't think that I made 10 edits with
> that one.
>
>
The rules for editors:
I hold 7 votes, at the end: one real account, five bots and one of my
auxiliary accounts -- not used for years -- have got right to vote. I
have one more account, but I don't think that I made 10 edits with
that one.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundat
On 20 August 2011 22:48, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
> > cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
>
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
> cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
>> concluding and the results being announced?
>>
>>
> First, I disagree
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <
cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
> concluding and the results being announced?
>
>
First, I disagree that it's "ridiculously unrealistic". Vote checking has
already starte
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Risker wrote:
> On 20 August 2011 14:31, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
>
>> I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
>> further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
>> distractions going in any way (though perhaps better sui
On 20 August 2011 14:31, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
> further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
> distractions going in any way (though perhaps better suited in their
> own thread).
>
> Since there is going t
> On wikimedia projects that are not Wikipedia (Wikia in specific comes
> to mind) I often find myself using templates that have not been
> defined on that installation. The English Wikipedia (which I am most
> familiar with) has many very usefull templates, especially the
> {{citeFoo}} templates,
I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
distractions going in any way (though perhaps better suited in their
own thread).
Since there is going to be such a short interval between the vote
concluding, and the res
On wikimedia projects that are not Wikipedia (Wikia in specific comes
to mind) I often find myself using templates that have not been
defined on that installation. The English Wikipedia (which I am most
familiar with) has many very usefull templates, especially the
{{citeFoo}} templates, but numero
Wikizine is alive :)
-- Forwarded message --
From: EN Wikizine
Date: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 22:47
Subject: EN Wikizine - Year: 2011 Week: 34 Number: 124
To: announc...@lists.wikimedia.org
**
__ __ _ _ _ _
/ / /\ \ (_) | _(_
Lodewijk, 20/08/2011 12:16:
> Maybe we could catch this discussion on wiki - it is an ever returning
> issue, and the lessons could be valuable for other campaigns too.
Andrew has already produced a very useful summary on
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/SecurePoll#Email_spam
Nemo
__
Maybe we could catch this discussion on wiki - it is an ever returning
issue, and the lessons could be valuable for other campaigns too.
Lodewijk
2011/8/20 Milos Rancic
> (It seems that mail server is not functioning properly. I've got
> "local delivery failed". Trying again or tomorrow.)
>
> O
13 matches
Mail list logo
