2011/8/2 Yaroslav M. Blanter :
> Any chance it would be agreed in the future? There are at least three
> working versions on big projects, German, Polish, and Russian Wikipedias
> (though I believe in Russian Wikipedia it was recently killed by users
> trying to set records and consequently reviewi
> It's the problem of the English Wikipedia not knowing what it wanted
aside
> from knowing it wanted something. Some wanted stable revisions (an
> approved
> form of an article), others wanted protection but editable, others
wanted
> enhanced review of content before publishing, etc. Pending cha
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Dan Rosenthal wrote:
>
> IMHO it worked just fine, but there were too many restrictions on when it
> could be used. So actually…Mono is right, it was doomed to fail from the
> beginning, regardless of its merits.
>
> -Dan
> _
On Aug 2, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Andre Engels wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter >> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did the idea of the second trial get any momentum in the end of the day?
>>> As a en.wp newbie, I could only find
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter >wrote:
> >
> > Did the idea of the second trial get any momentum in the end of the day?
> > As a en.wp newbie, I could only find the poll that the trial has been
> > discontinued, but n
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:06:10 -0500, Keegan Peterzell
wrote:
>
> Nope.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Pending_changes/Request_for_Comment_February_2011&oldid=428618051#Closure
I think I have seen this one, but I will have a closer look. Thanks for
the link.
Cheers
Y
Look, Pending Changes was and still is doomed.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter >wrote:
> >
> > Did the idea of the second trial get any momentum in the end of the day?
> > As a en.wp newbie, I could only find the poll
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>
> Did the idea of the second trial get any momentum in the end of the day?
> As a en.wp newbie, I could only find the poll that the trial has been
> discontinued, but nothing after that.
>
> Cheers
> Yaroslav
>
>
And why would we want to do something like that? We're not here to make
life easier for the SEO industry.
Kirill
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Well, Peter, it's got over 2,000 in-bound links, from user and user talk
pages:
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:41:28 -0400, Risker wrote:
> Yes it is, and it's an important one. Several of us had already been
> working on a plan for the second trial, and those of us discussing had
> widely agreed that it would be much more likely to be successful if more
of
> the recommendations on
Well, Peter, it's got over 2,000 in-bound links, from user and user talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-01/In_the_news
We should really look at making such links nofollow; only mainspace links
should be dofollow, and that should exclude nav templates and t
News and notes: Wikimania; why Board of Trustees elections attract few
votes; brief news
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-01/News_and_notes
In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about
Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief
12 matches
Mail list logo
