> That discussion was interesting for this one, because it brings up issues
> such as that merging even a relatively small wiki like ten (565 content
> pages, 3,204 total pages) into Meta would probably take some considerable
> work.
We need to lower barriers to cross-project collaboration.A
http://therexpedition.com/?p=59
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
A bot could do it, but that's not completely relevent.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:34 PM, . Courcelles >wrote:
>
> > I couldn't agree more, now that the date has passed, so should
> > ten.wikipedia. Outreach and Strategy have a mission, but n
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:34 PM, . Courcelles
> wrote:
>
>> I couldn't agree more, now that the date has passed, so should
>> ten.wikipedia. Outreach and Strategy have a mission, but nothing so
>> distinct that it would be out of scope on Meta, and combining those
>> three
>> projects would reduc
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:34 PM, . Courcelles wrote:
> I couldn't agree more, now that the date has passed, so should
> ten.wikipedia. Outreach and Strategy have a mission, but nothing so
> distinct that it would be out of scope on Meta, and combining those three
> projects would reduce the overhe
