On 29 May 2011 05:10, MZMcBride wrote:
> James Heilman wrote:
>> I think the upload wizard is a great especially the ability to upload many
>> images. One change I would love to see is instead of the "add caption here"
>> when one gets to the "use" section the description one just added appears in
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
> On 22/05/11 18:29, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>>
>> We are likely to reach each of the following on the way to our target,
>> and it would be great to announce them when we reach them:
>> 1 90% of literate people have a version of wikipedia avai
James Heilman wrote:
> I think the upload wizard is a great especially the ability to upload many
> images. One change I would love to see is instead of the "add caption here"
> when one gets to the "use" section the description one just added appears in
> that spot instead.
You should file a bug
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 19:50, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
> Identity of Anonymous Wikipedia Editors Not Protected by First Amendment
>
> http://ecommercelaw.typepad.com/ecommerce_law/2011/05/identity-of-anonymous-wikipedia-editors-not-protected-by-first-amendment.html
>
> Nothing unexpected.
>
> Fred
R
I think the upload wizard is a great especially the ability to upload many
images. One change I would love to see is instead of the "add caption here"
when one gets to the "use" section the description one just added appears in
that spot instead.
I posted at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commo
Hoi,
Having projects that rely on volunteers does not mean that what they do is
without consequence. The policy of the language committee insists on
requirements. They have to be met. One of the things we consider is the
involvement of native speakers ... In the language committee we are
volunteers
On 05/28/2011 05:02 PM, Mark wrote:
> On 5/26/11 3:05 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
>> * If literacy is low and there are no efforts to improve it, efforts
>> should go that way.
>> * Is it about the language without writing system? If yes, efforts
>> should go that way.
>
> I guess I'd say what efforts
On 5/26/11 3:05 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> * If literacy is low and there are no efforts to improve it, efforts
> should go that way.
> * Is it about the language without writing system? If yes, efforts
> should go that way.
I guess I'd say what efforts "should" be taken should depend on what the
