As Ray saids legal prosecution to claim for formal accomplishing of the
copyright terms is expensive and difficult. But the same happens the other
way around.
I would like to have a clear legal opinion about applying the terms without
going to court.
They have copied articles from Chinese Wikiped
Chinese Wikipedian is not required Baidu to give them money, but:
1. Remove the copyright violation materials
2. Change Baidu Baike to CC-by-sa in order they don't want to remove
3. Block the editor who copy content from Wikipedia
HW
寄件人﹕ Ray Saintonge
收件人﹕ Wikim
Because some website push out the un-released press release and Baidu give
response on it. Baidu reply that it is not truth and request people don't talk
about it anymore.
Baidu is request to post a notice for stock market. However, we have not yet
send out the press release and so far Baidu
On 04/24/11 9:35 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> Baidu Baike clearly have a considerable potential liability in terms
> of violation of copyright, including under Chinese law (assuming CC
> by-sa holds up).
>
> If they're traded on the stock market in Hong Kong (or anywhere else)
> - have they filed appr
Glad you guys brought this question up as I am working on rewriting one of
the things right now. See further discussioner here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#Welcome_email
All suggestions and tweaks are welcome.
Best wishes,
Lennart
--
Lennart Guldbrands
Baidu Baike clearly have a considerable potential liability in terms
of violation of copyright, including under Chinese law (assuming CC
by-sa holds up).
If they're traded on the stock market in Hong Kong (or anywhere else)
- have they filed appropriate notices with the relevant financial
oversigh
Village Pump on zh Wikipedia,
on
http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/WP:VPM#.E8.81.AF.E7.BD.B2.E8.87.B3.E7.99.BE.E5.BA.A6.E4.BF.A1.E4.BB.B6.E3.80.81.E6.96.B0.E9.97.BB.E7.A8.BF
and
it is still planning and it have not yet been send out to media. Also it is
not
a foundation press release but only a C
I'm sorry, where was the decision made to write a press release? I'm
really not sure that's the best approach. What attempts at direct
communication have been attempted so far?
On 24 April 2011 09:45, WereSpielChequers wrote:
> 16,000,000 out of 3,000,000 articles sounds high to me, it would mean
Baidu Baike do not translate the content copy from ENWP or JAWP. See an example
of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._E._Cummings and
http://baike.baidu.com/view/1401453.html , thank you.
Also, a new draft of the press release, without murge your text:
Baidu B
It should be 1600. Sorry for this.
HW
寄件人﹕ WereSpielChequers
收件人﹕ foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
傳送日期﹕ 2011/4/24 (日) 4:45:11 PM
主題： [Foundation-l] Letter to Baidu and press release "Baidu Baike copies
content
from Wikipedia without attribution" draft
16,000
16,000,000 out of 3,000,000 articles sounds high to me, it would mean
over 500% of it was copyvio. Could that be individual edits?
Otherwise I suggest:
day mon, 2011
Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.org), a non-profit project run by the
Wikimedia Foundation, uses an open licence but with some term
HW, 24/04/2011 06:05:
> Baidu Baike started in April 2006, and has included 3 million more articles
> now.
> However, Wikipedian's investigation shows that among these articles more than
> 16,000,000 were copied from Chinese, English or Japenese Wikipedia,[...]
There's something wrong here (perha
12 matches
Mail list logo
