2011/1/4 Andreas Kolbe :
> Thanks, interesting. Go to
>
> http://www.wiki4enterprise.org/index.php?title=Editor&action=edit
That's just FCK, an existing MediaWiki extension.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FCKeditor_%28Official%29
Their own editor still appears to be under active developm
Thanks, interesting. Go to
http://www.wiki4enterprise.org/index.php?title=Editor&action=edit
for example, and click on [Rich Editor] (above the button bar at the top of
the edit window). This gives you a WYSIWIYG display in the edit window.
Users can toggle between the two types of display.
A
http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideas#Sitenotice_-_special_banner
Hi folks. If you like it - just use on your user pages ;)
przykuta
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 05/01/11 00:33, Teofilo wrote:
> We are more or less 24 hours (19 hours, exactly) after I corrected the
> mistake, but the toolserver.org/~kolossos/openlayers is still wrong.
> This is not what a wiki is supposed to be.
You seem to be getting confused between a wiki and some software
written by
Hello all,
about WYSIWYG have a look to to this links:
*
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WissensWert/75_-_Einsatz_des_TWX_WYSIWYG_Editors
*
http://www.wiki4enterprise.org/index.php/Datei:Artikelbearbeitung_Twoonix.jpg.png
TWOONIX is working on an on an MediaWiki based editor.
Best Juliana
___
I'd like to precise because of my bad english that I don't how to handle
"polite" questioning without looking condescending or angry. I am
uttering my words with the most profound respect to Erik even if I
dissent about some topics with him.
Erik wrote:
>> I don't think any of the fundraising ban
Hi!
> I don't think any of the fundraising banners that ran made it
> substantially harder to access the information that people were coming
try reading text when you got subversively blinking banner at the top of it.
:-)
Domas
___
foundation-l maili
Greetings Teofilo,
Although RuWiki uses Flagged revisions, in most of the articles all changes
are "go live" immediately and this is true for Пьерфон (замок). Thank you
for your edit
http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9F%D1%8C%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD_%28%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D
The other day, I read the [[:en:Wikileaks]] article on Wikipedia. What
it said was, more or less, that Wilileaks is a leaks website that used
to be a wiki. And I wondered : how long will it take before we read
somewhere : Wikipedia, the Pedia that used to be a Wiki ?
Sooner than you might think.
Hi,
Happy new year everyone :)
I'm not gonna answer all the points raised in this threads as I don't
have all the elements (I didn't enjoy the animated banner for
example).
But I'd like to comment two points :
I/ The urgency to raise at the end of the fundraising. While I do
agree it could be mi
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The recent extended unavailability of database dumps is an example of
> serious failure, but failures like this happen when an organization is
> understaffed/underresourced and only able to focus on the immediate,
> not the longer term. And whe
11 matches
Mail list logo