Hello,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A quick announcement: we are temporarily turning off the fundraising banners
> for most logged in users. This will continue most likely through the end of
> the year. We did some quick checking and realized t
News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-12-20/News_and_notes
In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-12-20/In
On 20 December 2010 22:46, Fred Bauder wrote:
> The network effects are massive. Simply wanting doing something better
> doesn't work. What does work is Wikia wikis such as Lostpedia that will
> draw a small crowd.
Yeah. The small, specialist approach is clearly something that can
produce tiny
> On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein wrote:
>
>> Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
>> Â Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
>> chapters?
>> I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
>> good. That compe
On 20 December 2010 09:35, David Gerard wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein wrote:
>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
There can be no viable
>>> alternative to Wikipedia.
>
>> What?
>
>
> This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
> this stage for som
On 20 December 2010 19:47, Noein wrote:
> Is there a general consensus about achieving a monopoly as a good goal.
> Is this part of some public strategy? Is this the position of WMF? Of
> chapters?
> I thought I heard some weeks ago on that mail list that diversity is
> good. That competitors ar
Hi everyone,
A quick announcement: we are temporarily turning off the fundraising banners
for most logged in users. This will continue most likely through the end of
the year. We did some quick checking and realized that most people who are
logged in and intend to give have already given. Th
On 20/12/2010 15:31, David Gerard wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 17:15, MZMcBride wrote:
>> Marc Riddell wrote:
> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
>>> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
>
>> In th
On 20 December 2010 17:15, MZMcBride wrote:
> Marc Riddell wrote:
On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>>> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
> In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a bug.
Spec
Marc Riddell wrote:
>>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
> This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
In this case, that sounds like a feature, not a bug.
MZMcBride
>> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>
> There can be no viable alternative to Wikipedia.
>
This is the type of thinking that sets you up to being blindsided.
Marc Riddell
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscr
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:35, David Gerard wrote:
> (Any cases I've missed there?)
The madmen. Or is that overlaying both? :)
g
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
Please send me only necessary massege. Thanke, by- yeske group
On 12/19/10, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
wrote:
> Send foundation-l mailing list submissions to
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists
On 20 December 2010 02:31, Noein wrote:
> On 19/12/2010 23:07, Fred Bauder wrote:
>>> There can be no viable
>> alternative to Wikipedia.
> What?
This is a perennial thread on wikien-l. There's basically no way at
this stage for someone to be a better Wikipedia than Wikipedia. So
anyone else w
14 matches
Mail list logo
