On 12/16/2010 0:12, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> Why are these tables so out of date?
>
> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesArticlesNewPerDay.htm
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.
Forwarded to the whole list on behalf of a non-member.
-- Forwarded message --
From: gps
Date: Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:36 AM
Subject: Project Proposal - wiki to monitor the government spending -
GovSpendWatch Wiki
To: foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello,
One of the bigge
Why are these tables so out of date?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesArticlesNewPerDay.htm
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
In a message dated 12/14/2010 2:55:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
v...@fct.unl.pt writes:
> The Wikimedia projects power structure is definitely a serious
> candidate for such analysis.
>
What is this?
Link ?
Will
___
foundation-l mailing list
foun
In a message dated 12/14/2010 5:14:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
tstarl...@wikimedia.org writes:
> I've long suspected that the early FAQs and history pages gave Larry
> Sanger an exaggerated role because he wrote them himself. It will be
> interesting to see if any such conclusion can be drawn f
Is the current CC license retroactive to all of the old versions from the
beginning to now?
W
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On 16/12/10 08:04, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like versions of the articles beyond
> the first ~10 are automatically recoverable.
There were some changes made to the page text that weren't represented
in diff_log, specifically changing certain camel-case links to free
li
ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ), 15/12/2010 01:03:
> And here is the first http://wikipedia.com archive link available at web
> archive.
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20010727112808/http://www.wikipedia.org/
No, the first is
http://web.archive.org/web/20010331173908/http://www.wikipedia.com/
Tim Starl
Philippe (& team!),
This is really great. I know many people who will find this easier.
How long before this becomes the dominant mode of donation?
The email about it was also charming. Thanks for making it happen this year.
Sam.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, aude wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14
Philippe, this is great! I don't think I can express my excitement at this
finally happening.
By the way, Rand and I made sure that the information in the donor database
was definitely complete, if not necessarily clean, starting July 2008.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:55 AM, aude wrote:
> On Tu
On 15 December 2010 17:39, ResearchBiz wrote:
> True to FT2's vision, this story has already been picked up by the major
> media!
> http://www.examiner.com/[spam url snipped]
examiner.com is basically a paid blogging host with the only relation
to "media" being a news-site-like skin.
http://en
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM, ResearchBiz wrote:
> True to FT2's vision, this story has already been picked up by the major
> media!
>
> http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/original-copy-of-wikipedia-discovered
>
> Original copy of Wikipedia discovered
> December 14, 2010
> - by Gre
True to FT2's vision, this story has already been picked up by the major
media!
http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/original-copy-of-wikipedia-discovered
Original copy of Wikipedia discovered
December 14, 2010
- by Gregory Kohs, for Examiner.com
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Brian J Mingus, 15/12/2010 01:36:
>> Here is an interesting bit of history - the Wikipedia logo was first an
>> American flag. Then Scott Moonen suggested we make it a globe:
>
> No news, this is already on Meta:
> http://meta.wikimedi
Brian J Mingus, 15/12/2010 01:36:
> Here is an interesting bit of history - the Wikipedia logo was first an
> American flag. Then Scott Moonen suggested we make it a globe:
No news, this is already on Meta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Logo_history
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OldWikiPediaLogo
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Philippe Beaudette <
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> One member of the fundraising team had it on her Christmas list. Another
> literally begged for it. So today, I feel quite a sense of accomplishment
> in announcing that the Wikimedia Foundation is now able
Thanks, Liam. The hope is that this consistent income stream will provide the
Foundation with a steady source of income while giving donors another method
for giving that might fit their lifestyle. it has certainly been heavily
requested.
By past donors, I refer to both people who have donat
Phillipe,
congratulations on this! I suspect this will be the beginning of a whole new
revenue stream that might eventually surpass the "once a year" effort we
have always relied on. I know in Australia at least that this is a very
common method for charities to request donations as it results in a
This discovery is so great! Good work, Tim.
Perhaps we could make a book with the first pages as a souvenir.
/Lennart
2010/12/15 Marcus Buck
> An'n 15.12.2010 01:36, hett Brian J Mingus schreven:
> > http://grey.colorado.edu/wikipedia_2001/979773872.txt
> Nice to see that the quality of post
19 matches
Mail list logo
