On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 00:53, Marcus Buck wrote:
> An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
>> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
>> table each year?
>>
>> Fred
>
> According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3-month global pageview share of
> 4.74010%. Wikipe
Fortunately inflated page view counts could still be patched from available
log files.
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2010/11/page-views-anomaly-in-october-resolved/
Erik Zachte
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Adverts do not make content wrong, but create mistrust.
> Have a look what Lawrence Lessig tells about:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHma3ZQRVoA
After the first few minutes it turns into a long drawn out infomercial
supportin
> Fred Bauder
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on
> the table each year?
Nobody knows, because the unknown factor in such calculations
is whether Google would continue to bless Wikipedia so heavily if it
started running ads. You cannot assume that the curre
Hello,
Adverts do not make content wrong, but create mistrust.
Have a look what Lawrence Lessig tells about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHma3ZQRVoA
Kind regards
Ziko
2010/11/5 Cool Hand Luke :
> This was manifestly not a "fatal" idea. In fact, it appears they concluded
> that *operating
> "Billions" is not the appropate word here.
>
> Extrapolating from my own personal Adsense experience, I would suggest
> that
> with a single ad per article, the project would only earn perhaps 1 to 5
> million a year.
>
> That's being generous.
>
> W
The question has nothing to do with signing a
An'n 05.11.2010 23:44, hett Fred Bauder schreven:
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
> table each year?
>
> Fred
According to alexa.com Facebook has a 3-month global pageview share of
4.74010%. Wikipedia has 0.52984%. That's about 1/9th. According to
Wikipedi
"Billions" is not the appropate word here.
Extrapolating from my own personal Adsense experience, I would suggest that
with a single ad per article, the project would only earn perhaps 1 to 5
million a year.
That's being generous.
W
___
foundation-l
On 5 November 2010 22:44, Fred Bauder wrote:
> How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
> table each year?
Less than one soul.
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lis
I'll bite - it's about time for our yearly advert flame war anyway. The
answer is 0 dollars. That is because as soon as we put the advertising up we
lose credibility and Wikipedia is no more.
- Brian
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> How many billions in potential advertising
How many billions in potential advertising revenue do we leave on the
table each year?
Fred
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Finally, one fan:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/magazine/07FOB-medium-t.html
Fred
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
This was manifestly not a "fatal" idea. In fact, it appears they concluded
that *operating on donations *would be fatal. Moral of the story: Wikipedia
is different.
Considering how much spam we receive, and how long some of it persists, I
sometimes wonder if we haven't miscalculated the costs an
> I think you have hit the nail on the head. Now we just need to drive it
> in
> the rest of the way.
>>
>> These ethics standards serve the ideal of communicating reliable
>> knowledge to readers. This is one of the ideals that the Foundation was
>> built upon. They are also expressly designed to
... and compromise content, as TV Tropes found out:
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Administrivia/TheSituation?from=Main.TheGoogleIncident
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.o
On 11/5/10 3:21 PM, Florence Devouard wrote:
> On 11/5/10 1:37 AM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
>> A memo to Wikimedia community, friends, staff, and other stakeholders.
Arg. I just read your internal email. I should never read external
emails before internal news lists. My question is consequently
On 11/5/10 1:37 AM, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
> A memo to Wikimedia community, friends, staff, and other stakeholders.
>
> On Monday, November 15, we will launch the 2010 annual fundraising drive for
> the Wikimedia Foundation. As you know, our funding model relies on the
> support of our friends
I think you have hit the nail on the head. Now we just need to drive it in
the rest of the way.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/11/10, John Vandenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:36 AM,
> >
> > wrote:
> > >..
> > > There have been plenty of studies
Hi all,
The Movement Roles project continues, and many people with many unique
perspectives are already actively participating. For those of you not
closely following our work on the wiki[0], I want to bring two things
to your attention:
1. We will have a meeting on IRC[1] today, 5 November, at
19 matches
Mail list logo
