On 10/30/2010 10:57 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Erik Zachte
> wrote:
>
>
>> Anonymous editors are no longer counted at all.
>> This would have resulted in millions of addresses
>> (nowhere near the 75,000 someone stated earlier in this thread).
>
>
>
> Millions o
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
> Anonymous editors are no longer counted at all.
> This would have resulted in millions of addresses
> (nowhere near the 75,000 someone stated earlier in this thread).
Millions of anons have edited. In any given month about a million
anon
This thread drifted off topic into a discussion about how me measure our
editor base.
[Summary: editor stats will never be precise, but filtering duplicates
will be a good next step]
Some earlier comments noted how the count is inaccurate, or even skewed
systemically.
I agree with most comment
> > I'm sure you noticed that this 2008 study
> >
> > http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0050095
> >
> > criticises media reports for citing studies and
> experts with financial ties
> > to manufacturers, without disclosing these ties to the
> r
