On 5/7/2010 5:30 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> On 7 May 2010 16:07, Kim Bruning wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:30:18PM -0700, Michael Snow wrote:
>>
>>> announce-l still has issues. The Board of Trustees has directed me to
>>> release the following statement:
>>>
>> Just to be
2010/5/14 Jay Walsh
> Hi folks,
>
> The UX team folks have prepared a new rendering of the mark and it's
> available for review on the Prototype wiki:
> http://prototype.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/Main_Page
>
> I've made a short update the conversation thread on commons here:
>
> http://commo
Hi folks,
The UX team folks have prepared a new rendering of the mark and it's available
for review on the Prototype wiki:
http://prototype.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/Main_Page
I've made a short update the conversation thread on commons here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikipedia/
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
>> Is there a page on Meta for discussing the new logo? Among other
>> things, we need somewhere to discuss progress on localizing the new
>> logo into different languages. Perhaps the old
In a message dated 5/14/2010 11:35:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
> How do you ascertain the veracity of their statement? >>
---
Welcome to WikiWorld. We've never been able to claim that we know that
people are telling the truth, we tr
Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> On 14.05.2010 20:38, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> Many nudist will tell you that what happens on the beach stays on the
>> beach. There is no expectation that a photo taken by a friend, or
>> stranger for that matter, will end up on a public website. Indeed there
>
On 14.05.2010 20:38, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
> Many nudist will tell you that what happens on the beach stays on the
> beach. There is no expectation that a photo taken by a friend, or
> stranger for that matter, will end up on a public website. Indeed there
> have been recent case inclu
David Goodman wrote:
>
> But all of this is irrelevant to the original censorship issue,
> because we are not protecting our audience, who can personally or by
> proxy protect themselves & have the responsibility for doing so; we
> are protecting our subjects, who cannot.
>
First you have to def
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 5/14/2010 7:50:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> nawr...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>> Surely there is a way to meet educational goals without risking the
>> privacy or abuse of content subjects? >>
>
>
> How is a person uploading a picture of t
Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>> Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more
>> injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of
>> her making tea.
>>
>> Requiring an OTRS release from the mod
In a message dated 5/14/2010 7:50:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nawr...@gmail.com writes:
> Surely there is a way to meet educational goals without risking the
> privacy or abuse of content subjects? >>
How is a person uploading a picture of themselves to Commons expecting any
priv
The right to privacy is based explicitly on respecting cultural
taboos of individuals. Ordinary identifiable people should not be
shown in public doing things they reasonably would not like to be seen
doing, except when the public need for information is great enough to
overcome this. In WP terms
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
>> Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more
>> injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of
>> her making tea.
>>
>
> It can be.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more
> injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of
> her making tea.
>
It can be. Then again, an image of her making tea might be far more
i
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
>> Except the case that you make a photo of yourself. In this case the
>> OTRS ticket is not important like is not important in the point of
>> view of copyright.
>>
>> In any case what means
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> Except the case that you make a photo of yourself. In this case the
> OTRS ticket is not important like is not important in the point of
> view of copyright.
>
> In any case what means "injurious"? It can change in relation of the
> cultur
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more
> injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of
> her making tea.
>
> Requiring an OTRS release from the model for any nude and sexually e
Someone uploading a nude picture of their ex-girlfriend can be far more
injurious to the woman concerned than the same person uploading an image of her
making tea.
Requiring an OTRS release from the model for any nude and sexually explicit
content seems appropriate to me.
Andreas
--- On Fri
Robert Rohde wrote:
> Myself and several other people find the new Wikipedia logo to be
> rather disappointing. Specifically it seems too small (lots of empty
> white space), and the edges of the puzzle pieces lack definition when
> shown at the web scale. For a discussion of this, including poss
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Is there a page on Meta for discussing the new logo? Among other
> things, we need somewhere to discuss progress on localizing the new
> logo into different languages. Perhaps the old Logo page could be
> updated with the latest status and l
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The obligation to protect people against an invasion of their privacy
>>> is not limited to, or even mostly applicable to sexual images.
>>> Although sexual images are one of sever
-- Forwarded message --
From: miya
Date: 2010/5/14
Subject: [Commons-l] [POTY2009] Votin Round 1 now open
To: common...@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that it has now
opened the 2009 Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year competition.
Some technical questions about the logo:
1) What software was used in making the 3D model?
2) Are the data files for that model available somewhere? (Or will
they be made available?)
3) The SVG files provided appear to be based on painted wire frames
rather than true 3D renderings. This makes
Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva wrote:
> 2010/5/13 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen :
>
>> Samuel Klein wrote:
>>
>>> I agree strongly with this. You are right to point out the connection
>>> to improving BLP policies -- we should be much more careful to
>>> confirming model rights for people in any po
24 matches
Mail list logo
