Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Techman224 wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, the WMF got involved the moment when they removed the keys,
>> also the DMCA notice (or any other notice)
>> is given to the person or organization that runs the website. It is not
>> given to the user who posted the content as they
Forwarded as per request. -Ryan
-- Forwarded message --
From: darklama
Date: Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM
Subject: Discussion about proposal for multilingual Wikibooks
To: foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
Pharos wrote:
> A multilingual Wikibooks would be valuable to the
Forwarded as per request.
-Ryan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Keegan Paul
Date: Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM
Subject: Next IRC hours for the Living People Task Force
To: English Wikipedia ,
foundation-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello, all.
The next IRC hours will begin at 4:00
Andrew Gray wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 19:41, wrote:
>
>> Which means of course that a person could claim copyright to the very
>> technology underlying Wikipedia, and demand the entire project be taken
>> down.
>> In fact a different mentally ill person could make this claim every month
>> a
Techman224 wrote:
> Unfortunately, the WMF got involved the moment when they removed the keys,
> also the DMCA notice (or any other notice)
> is given to the person or organization that runs the website. It is not given
> to the user who posted the content as they can't
> remove content after it
Dan Rosenthal wrote:
> Doesn't matter how they were posted. If they were, and there is a valid
> notice, the action is to expeditiously remove them, notify the poster and let
> the poster decide if they want to counter-notice and contest it.
>
> All the second guessing in the world is irrelevant
geni wrote:
>
> Some
> calculator of little note? It would appear not.
>
Sarcasm much?
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/found
2010/3/6 ksaka98 :
> Hi from jawp.
>
>
> 山吹色の御菓子(kigen2700nen) 's question is
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/190708#190708
>
> Wikipedia英語版にはWikipedia's principlesがあります。
> これは、各言語版に於いて参加者の裁量で自由に変更することができるのですか？
>
> Wikipedia英語版にあるprinciple and guidelinesを純粋にコピーアンドペーストしたものを
Hi from jawp.
山吹色の御菓子(kigen2700nen) 's question is
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/190708#190708
Wikipedia英語版にはWikipedia's principlesがあります。
これは、各言語版に於いて参加者の裁量で自由に変更することができるのですか？
Wikipedia英語版にあるprinciple and guidelinesを純粋にコピーアンドペーストしたものを、
コミュニティの合意が無くてもprinciple and guidel
kigen2700...@gmail.com wrote:
> In Wikipedia Japanese version, the document with the template of principle
> and guidelines up to the present time was operated from the start without
> obtaining the mutual agreement of the community. In Wikipedia Japanese
> version, the participant was doing princi
It writes in Japanese.
I am not good at English. time is necessary for the reply.
I say, user "山吹色の御菓子" of Wikipedia Japanese version.
It questions as case of the entire Wikipedia.
There is Wikipedia 's principles in Wikipedia English version.
Can this be freely changed by the participant's discre
On 4 March 2010 19:41, wrote:
> Which means of course that a person could claim copyright to the very
> technology underlying Wikipedia, and demand the entire project be taken down.
> In fact a different mentally ill person could make this claim every month
> and force the project offline.
>
>
On 6 March 2010 01:51, wrote:
>
> That's extreme. We already use reliable sources in the project. The key is
> "reasonable" >effort, not Herculean effort, not absurd effort, just a
> reasonable effort.
Outside some rather narrow areas copyright law tends not to care about
reasonable effort.
On 4 March 2010 19:41, wrote:
> Which means of course that a person could claim copyright to the very
> technology underlying Wikipedia, and demand the entire project be taken down.
> In fact a different mentally ill person could make this claim every month
> and force the project offline.
>
>
policy とguidelineは各言語版のコミュニティの合意を得ずに、英語版からコピーアンドペーストし、policy
またはguidelineのテンプレートを付けた文書は有効ですか？日本語版ではスタートしたときからコミュニティの合意を得ず、policy
またはguidelineのテンプレートを付けた文書を使用していますが、これらは英語版と違反していても有効なのですか。
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsu
15 matches
Mail list logo
