eia says:
I'm sorry, but at least in your e-mail you mainly make a lot of
statements that I can imagine are worded in such a way that they don't
really ask for a reply, and one rethorical question. So if you want
information, I suggest you try to put your questions down a little
more cons
I'm not an expert in the particular arena, but it would seem that the onus of
any requirement on individual accounts lies on the account holder; it would be
patently unreasonable to expect a website or service provider to have any
method of enforcing that.
For instance, AOL has not the slightes
I'm new to this discussion, so I may be inserting at the wrong place and
time, but I want to suggest that Wikipedia's counsel determine whether
the Digital Millennium Copyright Act implicitly requires individual
accounts in order to maintain the Foundation's protections under the
Act. I don't know
In the following news article, it is said that Google showed French
journalists in Paris a webpage with search results including Wikipedia
in its presentation of its new "Goggles" search engine.
I think the WMF lawyers should have a closer look at that and see if
WMF is not entitled to a compensat
I'm sorry, but at least in your e-mail you mainly make a lot of
statements that I can imagine are worded in such a way that they don't
really ask for a reply, and one rethorical question. So if you want
information, I suggest you try to put your questions down a little
more constructively and maybe
