Ray Saintonge wrote:
> At some point we need to be able to say to our users: "We have a high
> degree of confidence that this [specific] material is free, but these
> difficulties exist: ... Use it at your own risk."
There is this idea of having copyright insurance. There are useful works
publi
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> So, the replacing current ugly-copyvio-template -> OTRS scheme for
> something else must take into consideration various scenarios which
> are currently handled by that scheme in quite often teribbly
> unfriendly style but anyway it is at
2009/11/22 Robert Rohde :
> For some applications (though not necessarily all), it might help if
> the OTRS process was replaced by a standard online permission form
> rather than having Wikimedians negotiate with outsiders in the hope of
> getting them to say magic words.
>
> I might imagine a pro
For some applications (though not necessarily all), it might help if
the OTRS process was replaced by a standard online permission form
rather than having Wikimedians negotiate with outsiders in the hope of
getting them to say magic words.
I might imagine a process somewhat like the following:
1)
Milos Rancic wrote:
> But, during the couple of previous days I've got one more contribution
> to our Monument. This kind of contributions make me to think that
> Wikipedia in English (not just en.wp for sure) is becoming -- slowly
> but surely -- the main problem in spreading free knowledge.
>
Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
> I see a lot of well meaning people responding here, but maybe its time to go
> back to the basics. No non free pictures, period. No more bureaucracy plus
> cost savings on not having to run the permissions systems.
>
This is simplistic. No-one seriously here is oppos
2009/11/22 Milos Rancic :
> Keep in mind that this is not about non-free content, this is not
> about a possibility that professor didn't understand all consequences
> of his approval; this is just about The Form. The Bureaucracy. Note,
> also, that this cooperation exists for four years. I don't
On 11/22/2009 05:57 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/11/22 Judson Dunn :
>
>> And in defense of the bureaucratic morons, you might be surprised the
>> number of super positive generous people that want their work on
>> Wikipedia that are completely unwilling to allow 3rd parties to use
>> their work.
2009/11/22 Geoffrey Plourde :
> I see a lot of well meaning people responding here, but maybe its time to go
> back to the basics. No non free pictures, period. No more bureaucracy plus
> cost savings on not having to run the permissions systems.
I submit that you aren't reading the messages s
I see a lot of well meaning people responding here, but maybe its time to go
back to the basics. No non free pictures, period. No more bureaucracy plus cost
savings on not having to run the permissions systems.
From: Tomasz Ganicz
To: Wikimedia Foundation Ma
2009/11/22 Judson Dunn :
> And in defense of the bureaucratic morons, you might be surprised the
> number of super positive generous people that want their work on
> Wikipedia that are completely unwilling to allow 3rd parties to use
> their work. I don't personally make people say "The Great Sent
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> Very simply. If an organisation is going to make a project it will get
> their own space on "Staging Area" and will upload their stuff there
> without any legal problems. Then, one or more editors must examine
> this stuff adding to it meta-d
2009/11/22 Ray Saintonge :
> Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
>> The
>> idea is to create a "Staging Area" - a wiki (or non-wiki) project
>> which is not public and can be used for media and meta-data mass
>> storage before sending the stuff to public projects. The idea is that
>> all permissions and other leg
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia)
wrote:
> http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/081296p.pdf
I've placed this onto Wikisource.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Daniel_Schrock_v._Learning_Curve_International,_Inc
I'm cleaning up the style now.
> This is a Seventh Cir
14 matches
Mail list logo
