Sue,
I sent the below included inquiry to wikitech-l regarding
http://flaggedrevs.labs.wikimedia.org/.
Now almost a month later I still have received no response regarding
the status of
this test deployment. It is is still not active on the test site, —
although this
has literally gone on for mo
In a message dated 9/27/2009 5:51:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
> I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
> resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
>
> That seems to be a demand to have the highest resolution copies possible.>>
>
>
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/27/2009 1:29:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
>
>
>> I have a reproduction of Rembrandt's "Toby and Anna" whilst that
>> doesn't give the producer of the reproduction the right to stop me
>> making copies from i
In a message dated 9/27/2009 1:29:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
> I have a reproduction of Rembrandt's "Toby and Anna" whilst that
> doesn't give the producer of the reproduction the right to stop me
> making copies from it, it also doesn't give me or you s
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ferrer wrote:
> Checkusers in Russian Wikipedia abused the 'checkuser' rights (for
> example linked to me unrelated edits from open proxy with marasmic
> vandalism -- create marasmic attackpages-like topic on «Request for
> Administrators» about Kalan, obviously wi
Checkusers in Russian Wikipedia abused the 'checkuser' rights (for
example linked to me unrelated edits from open proxy with marasmic
vandalism -- create marasmic attackpages-like topic on «Request for
Administrators» about Kalan, obviously with a view to Kalan thought
that I was a degenerat-pədera
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> I thought that the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision basically was that a
> reproduction like this enjoys no new copyright ?
>
I have a reproduction of Rembrandt's "Toby and Anna" whilst that
doesn't give the producer of the reproduction the right to stop me
making
I thought that the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision basically was that a
reproduction like this enjoys no new copyright ?
W.J.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/fou
Teofilo wrote:
> David Monniaux said : "release lower resolution pictures under free
> license, keep high resolution pictures (those suitable for art books,
> posters and so on) proprietary."
>
> I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full resolution
> pictures of Public Domain works. Bec
Also, checkusers in Russian Wikipedia abused the 'checkuser' rights
(for example linked to me unrelated edits from open proxy with
marasmic vandalism -- create marasmic attackpages-like topic on
«Request for Administrators» about Kalan, obviously with a view to
Kalan thought that I was a degenerat-
This is more of an issue for foundation-l than wikitech-l.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Ferrer wrote:
> Also, checkusers in Russian Wikipedia abused the 'checkuser' rights
> (for example linked to me unrelated edits from open proxy with
> marasmic vandalism -- create marasmic attackpages-lik
11 matches
Mail list logo
