Hoi,
Uploading material that is incompatible with our license, I would personally
consider it a bad faith move. Only when it is considered that the inclusion
of a GFDL file is similar to fair use within the context of a Wikipedia
clone would it be acceptable. This however possibly negates the reaso
I wrote:
> I'm taking Stevertigo off moderation. He has agreed by private email
> not to continue the dispute resolution mailing list thread.
I also asked him to not make me immediately regret my decision, and to
let this thing with Austin drop. I repeated this request in a second
private email w
mizusumashi, 25/07/2009 16:54:
> Q1) All media files that have been licensed under the GFDL and allowed
> to relicense under CC-BY-SA were relicensed by
> [[wmf:Resolution:Licensing update approval]]?
Yes, all GFDL "1.2 and later". See
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GFDL_1.3_relicensin
I'm pleased to accept the epithet. Pro-freedom dogmatist describes me
nicely with respect to many areas of life, including both sexuality
and access to information. I think it comes close to describing most
of the people at Wikipedia in matters of personal life and of
information.
Those who suppo
Why did you feel it necessary to reply to Gerard? Is it so important
to you to have the last word? In your last e-mail, you said you didn't
want to continue this thread any further. The best way to put an end
to it is to stop responding to others' messages rather than to tell
others not to respond
W dniu 31.07.2009 01:16, stevertigo pisze:
> It occurs to me that when people donate money to something, it is to
> some degree with an expectation that the recipient entity grows to
> eventually gain a certain kind of financial self-sufficiency. Is this
> not also the case with Wikimedia and man
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Matthew Brown wrote:
> As opposed to you, who'd just love to destroy that content to get money?
Destroy what content? Recall I used the terms "fetish" and other
destructive-sexuality / pro-depravity articles and images" and
referred to people who support their ubi
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Gerard
Meijssen wrote:
> Please consider a topic that matters.
It's not important that this list be run according to certain basic
rules and principles?
And no doubt there are others here who dislike your own comments for
the simple fact that they extend the threa
Hi folks:
This is just a reminder: Eugene and I will be having our regular
weekly office hours to discuss strategic planning. The time for this
week is:
Tuesdays from 20:00-21:00 UTC, which is: Tuesday, 1-2pm PDT or
Tuesday, 4-5pm EDT.
The office hours will be held in #wikimedia on the IR
Samuel Klein wrote (in two messages):
> >> *A wiki for book metadata, with an entry for every published
> >> work, statistics about its use and siblings, and discussion
> >> about its usefulness as a citation (a collaboration with
> >> OpenLibrary, merging WikiCite ideas)
> I could see this ha
phoebe ayers, 02/08/2009 08:50:
> in the meantime we *really* need
> a nice-looking one page overview about the projects to hand out -- any
> graphic designers up for this? And of course a new press kit too
I suppose local chapters have many...
See Wikimedia Italia last one:
http://www.wikimedia.
11 matches
Mail list logo
