Re: [Foundation-l] Report To The Board: March 2009

2009-07-23 Thread Sue Gardner
Hi Mike, Generally, it's people getting in touch with us. We do very little active media outreach -- in fact, we probably do zero. There is also lots of media contact in addition to that list -- for example Jimmy, and many of the chapters, do interviews that don't show up there. But it's a pr

Re: [Foundation-l] Britain or Ukraine? What UK stands for in Wikimedia jargon

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote: > I suggest a hatnote on the main page of the site: "This is the website > of Wikimedia United Kingdom. For other uses, see uk.wikimedia.org > (disambiguation)." I actually coined the word "hatnote" - probably in violation of our 'no neolog

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote: > I'm sorry, this is really not something that needs discussion on > foundation-l. This concerns English Wikipedia, and not the wider > Wikimedia community or the Foundation itself. Please consider moving > this discussion back to the project-s

Re: [Foundation-l] Report To The Board: March 2009

2009-07-23 Thread Casey Brown
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote: > Sue, thanks so much for compiling and sharing these reports, it is > always great to see how much the Foundation is doing as time progresses. > > I notice that in each report there has been a list of media with which > the Foundation has had

Re: [Foundation-l] Report To The Board: March 2009

2009-07-23 Thread Mike.lifeguard
Sue, thanks so much for compiling and sharing these reports, it is always great to see how much the Foundation is doing as time progresses. I notice that in each report there has been a list of media with which the Foundation has had contact - is that generally interviews requested by the media, o

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Mike.lifeguard
I'm sorry, this is really not something that needs discussion on foundation-l. This concerns English Wikipedia, and not the wider Wikimedia community or the Foundation itself. Please consider moving this discussion back to the project-specific mailing list or the project itself so to the community

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, David Gerard wrote: > 2009/7/23 Geoffrey Plourde : > >> Nothing prevents you from starting your own mailing list if Cary won't. As I >> am not a member of the wikien cesspool, what purpose are you thinking of? > > > wikien-l is full of useful and relevant stuff abo

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread David Gerard
2009/7/23 Geoffrey Plourde : > Nothing prevents you from starting your own mailing list if Cary won't. As I > am not a member of the wikien cesspool, what purpose are you thinking of? wikien-l is full of useful and relevant stuff about en:wp. It's not very cesspooly these days, really! Mostly.

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Casey Brown
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Geoffrey Plourde wrote: > Nothing prevents you from starting your own mailing list if Cary won't. As I > am not a member of the wikien cesspool, what purpose are you thinking of? > Why don't you go have a peek at the archives instead of bringing what you character

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Geoffrey Plourde
Nothing prevents you from starting your own mailing list if Cary won't. As I am not a member of the wikien cesspool, what purpose are you thinking of? Geoffrey From: stevertigo To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:22:27 PM S

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
Cary Bass wrote: > You have not gained any additional support. Open discussion is of course the first step in gaining support. We've been waiting for your participation, as you seem to be the functionary in charge of starting new lists. Now that you are participating in an open discussion, we ca

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Cary Bass wrote: > Mailing lists don't get opened by mailing list discussions Hm. I also filed a request on mediazilla, which was automatically assigned to you. > and the "largely positive" responses you received were neither > numerous nor > meritorious of cre

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Chad wrote: > Not sure what this has to do with foundation-l, can this go back to wikien-l? Thomas' comment was a bit off-topic, but that does not mean this entire thread belongs elsewhere. There are at least four reasons why this discussion belongs here. If you

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Chad
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/7/23 stevertigo : >> That actually wasn't my proposal to "resolve" disputes there. On the >> other hand, if a report to ANI or RFC receives attention that solves >> certain problems, then does that mean you would object to the usage of >>

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/7/23 stevertigo : > That actually wasn't my proposal to "resolve" disputes there. On the > other hand, if a report to ANI or RFC receives attention that solves > certain problems, then does that mean you would object to the usage of > ANI or RFC to "resolve disputes?" ANI and RFC *are* part o

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > Responses were rather mixed - there were different proposals > being bounced around. There weren't any "different proposals." Aside from suggestions taht dealt with the scope such a list would take, there was a brief suggestion for a separa

Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-23 Thread Everton Zanella Alvarenga
2009/7/23 Fred Benenson : > Hi There, >  I"m a long time lurker on this list but work for Creative Commons and am a > semi-pro photog in my spare time. I just wrote a post about "the reality" of > pro photography on Wikipedia: > > http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/16017 > Ops, sorry! I didn'

Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-23 Thread Everton Zanella Alvarenga
The Reality of Professional Photography on Wikipedia, by Fred Benenson http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/16017 -- http://blogdotom.wordpress.com/sobre ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wik

Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-23 Thread Fred Benenson
Hi There, I"m a long time lurker on this list but work for Creative Commons and am a semi-pro photog in my spare time. I just wrote a post about "the reality" of pro photography on Wikipedia: http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/16017 Figured you all would find it interesting! Best, Fred

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Cary Bass
Cary Bass Volunteer Coordinator Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running! Support the Wikimedia Foundation today: http://donate.wikimedia.org Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Phone: 415.839.6885 x 601 Fax: 415.882.0495 E-Mail: c...@wikimedia.org > -Original Message- > From: foundatio

Re: [Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/7/23 stevertigo : > I started a thread on Wikien-l last month suggesting we start a > dispute resolution mailing list: > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2009-June/101428.html > > Responses were largely positive, and what little criticism the idea > got (much of it from Thomas Dal

[Foundation-l] Dispute resolution mailing list

2009-07-23 Thread stevertigo
I started a thread on Wikien-l last month suggesting we start a dispute resolution mailing list: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2009-June/101428.html Responses were largely positive, and what little criticism the idea got (much of it from Thomas Dalton) was fairly easy to deal with.

[Foundation-l] Report To The Board: March 2009

2009-07-23 Thread Sue Gardner
April will follow shortly; thanks for your patience waiting for these :-) .. Report to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Covering: March 2009 Prepared by:Sue Gardner, Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation Prepared for: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustee

Re: [Foundation-l] new survey of digital collection copyrights

2009-07-23 Thread Teofilo
> However, this > study presents evidence that, far from educating users about copyright > or promoting the public domain, many libraries engaged in digitization > projects are omitting a key tool for copyright education or using it in > ways that undermine users’ needs for accurate copyright infor

Re: [Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

2009-07-23 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
> That's a great idea. Having a prominent link to "recently uploaded > images" > (I'm thinking of something like [[Special:NewFiles]] that shows more than > 50 > entries on a page with rc-style metadata, combined from the local wiki + > commons) next to "recent changes" on wikipedia would make qui