I agree this is important, to the projects and to the progress of flagged
revs as a concept (which is still one step of a long journey). It is worth
a quick thread on f-l for that reason if not for general interest.
Sj
samuel klein. s...@laptop.org. +1 617 529 4266
On Jun 19, 2009 6:47 PM, "p
Hi all,
It's been 10 days since the last note on flagged revisions, which is
sufficiently important to warrant a follow up at this point in my view. I'll
try and focus the questions a bit in order not to pester, but with the
intention of helping things forward;
see https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/sh
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> * Commons (like repository) with sysops elected by other projects
> which will use it like repository (and in this case the policies are
> decided by these projects)
> * another project (wikialbum???) which helps Commons to improve the
> q
Yes, that's a very good idea. That's the main reason I got involved
there, and the main reason I continue to be. The fact of the matter is
that if you want Commons to provide service to your project, the best
people to do that is... people from that project. Commons isn't a closed
community - you'r
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
> some of them in languages I have no idea of like Japanese. This is of
> course a meta issue and somebody (me for instance) could take an
> initiative and create a project alerting other wikipedias of new image
> arrivals (I vaguely remem
Someone (I believe David?) suggested actively encouraging some of your
editors/admins to become more active on Commons. I think this is good advice
for any project that finds itself using or depending on the services Commons
provides. Just as the Commons community will become more aware of your
nee
