Re: [Foundation-l] [Wiktionary-l] Divergent Wiktionary logos

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Casey Brown wrote: > >> My own suggestion would be to use >> individual blocks but to have them be like type pieces from a printing >> press. > > Though actual proposals for new logos will be accepted later (once it > is decided how things will work), you can leave

Re: [Foundation-l] Divergent Wiktionary logos

I agree with Austin. We cannot just force communities to adopt this new thing. Lets try for a clean start. From: Austin Hair To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:30:08 PM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Divergent Wiktionary logo

Re: [Foundation-l] Divergent Wiktionary logos

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Cary Bass wrote: > I understand that there are complaints that new logo has elements too > closely resembling Scrabble pieces, or are otherwise too cartooned to > some. The "new" logo does maintain some visual identity as a project > logo, while the "classic" logo

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wiktionary-l] Divergent Wiktionary logos

2009/3/26 Casey Brown : > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Michael Snow wrote: >> My own suggestion would be to use >> individual blocks but to have them be like type pieces from a printing >> press. > > Though actual proposals for new logos will be accepted later (once it > is decided how things

Re: [Foundation-l] [Wiktionary-l] Divergent Wiktionary logos

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Michael Snow wrote: > Given that background, I would conclude that neither of the current > options is desirable, and we need to develop a new Wiktionary logo. Yes, that's what Cary brought up. :-) On peopl

[Foundation-l] Announcement Election Committee

Hello everyone, Election time is nearly upon us again. As you may recall the board has three directly elected representatives on it which serve for two years. After last year's restructuring we decided to have the board elections every odd year, and have the chapters select their represent