2008/11/15 Gerard Meijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hoi,
> When the EU develops a law that deals with copyright and licensing, it will
> implicitly include "Free" licenses.
EU backed laws have tended towards incidental hostility to free licenses.
>It is exactly for this reason that
> communities li
Hoi,
When the EU develops a law that deals with copyright and licensing, it will
implicitly include "Free" licenses. It is exactly for this reason that
communities like ours who have at least an idea of what we consider to be
the right way forward are asked to step on the plate. When we, as a
commu
Hello,
Now, the Wikipedia Academy in Lund has ended. A big success, as the number
of participants was double the number we had anticipated. The entire
conference was covered by three bloggers, collected here:
http://wikipediaacademy.blogspot.com/ (Swedish, but translatable for example
via Google),
2008/11/15 Michael Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14 Nov 2008, at 15:47, geni wrote:
>
>> 2008/11/14 teun spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Agree.
>>>
>>> And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses
>>> could be
>>> informed?
>>
>>
>> There is nothing in there of any real signif
On 14 Nov 2008, at 15:47, geni wrote:
> 2008/11/14 teun spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Agree.
>>
>> And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses
>> could be
>> informed?
>
>
> There is nothing in there of any real significance to free licenses.
Isn't that something that shou
Hoi,
All projects are started with consent of the board. I take it that the board
has the final say on blocking / removing projects. I can imagine that the
WMF office / organisation takes this decision on there own accord. These are
the two who have the power to establish facts.
Thanks,
Gerar
The powers that be, Gerard?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
