[PATCH] fortran: Fix specification expression check in submodules [PR114475]

Hell(o), it didn't take long for my recent patch for PR111781 to show a regression. The fix proposed here is actually the one Harald posted in the PR. I can't imagine a case where it wouldn't do the right thing. Regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master? -- >8 -- The patch fixing P

Re: [PATCH] fortran: Fix specification expression check in submodules [PR114475]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:30:42PM +0100, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hell(o), > > it didn't take long for my recent patch for PR111781 to show a regression. > The fix proposed here is actually the one Harald posted in the PR. > I can't imagine a case where it wouldn't do the right thing. > Regression t

[PATCH] Fortran: fix DATA and derived types with pointer components [PR114474]

Dear all, the attached patch fixes a 10+ regression for cases where a derived type with a pointer component is used in a DATA statement. The failure looked obscure, see testcase comments, and pointed to a possible issue in the resolution (order). For the failing test, the target variable was seen

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix DATA and derived types with pointer components [PR114474]

On 3/27/24 1:42 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, the attached patch fixes a 10+ regression for cases where a derived type with a pointer component is used in a DATA statement. The failure looked obscure, see testcase comments, and pointed to a possible issue in the resolution (order). For the